[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965: fix blorp stage_prog_data->param leak

[Andres Gomez]

Tapani, this patch landed with the "mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org"
tag without specifying branch.

However, it addresses a fix for 8d90e28839, which didn't land in 17.2
so I'm skipping this patch for that queue.

I hope this is OK with you. Let me know otherwise.

On Fri, 2017-10-27 at 15:55 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> Patch uses mem_ctx for allocation to ensure param array gets freed
> later, in blorp clear case this happens in blorp_params_get_clear_kernel.
> 
> ==6164== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 61 of 193
> ==6164==    at 0x4C2EB6B: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
> ==6164==    by 0x12E31C6C: ralloc_size (ralloc.c:121)
> ==6164==    by 0x130189F1: fs_visitor::assign_constant_locations() (brw_fs.cpp:2095)
> ==6164==    by 0x13022D32: fs_visitor::optimize() (brw_fs.cpp:5715)
> ==6164==    by 0x13024D5A: fs_visitor::run_fs(bool, bool) (brw_fs.cpp:6229)
> ==6164==    by 0x1302549A: brw_compile_fs (brw_fs.cpp:6570)
> ==6164==    by 0x130C4B07: blorp_compile_fs (blorp.c:194)
> ==6164==    by 0x130D384B: blorp_params_get_clear_kernel (blorp_clear.c:79)
> ==6164==    by 0x130D3C56: blorp_fast_clear (blorp_clear.c:332)
> ==6164==    by 0x12EFA439: do_single_blorp_clear (brw_blorp.c:1261)
> ==6164==    by 0x12EFC4AF: brw_blorp_clear_color (brw_blorp.c:1326)
> ==6164==    by 0x12EFF72B: brw_clear (brw_clear.c:297)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com>
> ---
>  src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp b/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp
> index 4616529abc..6b27c38be7 100644
> --- a/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp
> +++ b/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp
> @@ -2092,7 +2092,7 @@ fs_visitor::assign_constant_locations()
>      */
>     uint32_t *param = stage_prog_data->param;
>     stage_prog_data->nr_params = num_push_constants;
> -   stage_prog_data->param = ralloc_array(NULL, uint32_t, num_push_constants);
> +   stage_prog_data->param = ralloc_array(mem_ctx, uint32_t, num_push_constants);
>     if (num_pull_constants > 0) {
>        stage_prog_data->nr_pull_params = num_pull_constants;
>        stage_prog_data->pull_param = ralloc_array(NULL, uint32_t,
-- 
Br,

Andres