[Mesa-dev] [AppVeyor] mesa master #6216 failed
Marathe, Yogesh
yogesh.marathe at intel.com
Tue Nov 21 04:33:49 UTC 2017
Don't know if this is a concern. The patch was built & tested with intel mesa CI and locally. Does this need attention or can be ignored?
Please advise.
-Yogesh.
>From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On
>Behalf Of AppVeyor
>Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 4:23 AM
>To: mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: [Mesa-dev] [AppVeyor] mesa master #6216 failed
>
>Build mesa 6216 failed
>Commit 971b3c019b by Aravindan Muthukumar on 11/9/2017 5:45 AM:
>i965: Optimize bucket index calculation\n\nReducing Bucket index
>calculation to O(1).\n\nThis algorithm calculates the index using
>matrix method. Assuming\nPAGE_SIZE is 4096, matrix arrangement is as
>below:\n\n 1*4096 2*4096 3*4096 4*4096\n 5*4096 6*4096 7*4096 8*4096\n
>10*4096 12*4096 14*4096 16*4096\n 20*4096 24*4096 28*4096 32*4096\n ...
>... ... ...\n ... ... ... ...\n ... ... ... max_cache_size\n\nFrom this
>matrix its clearly seen that every row follows the below way:\n\n ...
>... ... n\n n+(1/4)n n+(1/2)n n+(3/4)n 2n\n\nRow is calculated as
>log2(size/PAGE_SIZE) Column is calculated as\nconverting the difference
>between the elements to fit into power size of\ntwo and indexing
>it.\n\nFinal Index is (row*4)+(col-1)\n\nTested with Intel Mesa
>CI.\n\nImproves performance of 3DMark on BXT by 0.705966% +/- 0.229767%
>(n=20)\n\nv4: Review comments on style and code comments implemented
>(Ian).\nv3: Review comments implemented (Ian).\nv2: Review comments
>implemented (Jason).\n\nSigned-off-by: Aravindan Muthukumar
><aravindan.muthukumar at intel.com>\nSigned-off-by: Kedar Karanje
><kedar.j.karanje at intel.com>\nReviewed-by: Yogesh Marathe
><yogesh.marathe at intel.com>\nSigned-off-by: Ian Romanick
><ian.d.romanick at intel.com> Configure your notification preferences
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list