[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] spirv: fix bug when OpSpecConstantOp calls a conversion
Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
siglesias at igalia.com
Wed Nov 29 07:17:03 UTC 2017
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 13:13 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 10:25 PM, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> > In that case, nir_eval_const_opcode() will evaluate the conversion
> > but as it was using destination's bit_size, the resulting
> > value was just a cast of the source constant value. By passing the
> > source's bit size, it does the conversion properly.
> >
> > Fixes:
> >
> > dEQP-VK.spirv_assembly.instruction.*.opspecconstantop.*convert*
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias at igalia.com>
> > ---
> > src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > ----
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c
> > b/src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c
> > index 2cc3c275ea9..ffbda4f1946 100644
> > --- a/src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c
> > +++ b/src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c
> > @@ -1348,14 +1348,35 @@ vtn_handle_constant(struct vtn_builder *b,
> > SpvOp opcode,
> > bool swap;
> > nir_alu_type dst_alu_type =
> > nir_get_nir_type_for_glsl_type(val->const_type);
> > nir_alu_type src_alu_type = dst_alu_type;
> > - nir_op op = vtn_nir_alu_op_for_spirv_opcode(opcode,
> > &swap, src_alu_type, dst_alu_type);
> > -
> > unsigned num_components = glsl_get_vector_elements(val-
> > >const_type);
> > - unsigned bit_size =
> > - glsl_get_bit_size(val->const_type);
> > + unsigned bit_size;
> >
> > - nir_const_value src[4];
> > assert(count <= 7);
> > +
> > + switch (opcode) {
> > + case SpvOpUConvert:
> > + case SpvOpConvertFToU:
> > + case SpvOpConvertFToS:
> > + case SpvOpConvertSToF:
> > + case SpvOpConvertUToF:
> > + case SpvOpSConvert:
> > + case SpvOpFConvert:
>
> I'm not sure what we should do here. Most of these opcodes are not
> valid in SpvOpSpecConstantOp in a Shader. Only SpvOpSConvert and
> SpvOpFConvert are allowed. I guess it's trivial enough to support
> the
> others anyway...
Right.
> do those dEQP-VK.spirv_assembly.instruction.* tests
> exercise the other opcodes?
>
No, they only exercise SpvOpFConvert and SpvOpSConvert. Do you prefer
to just support these two opcodes for the moment?
With or without that change, does it get your R-b?
Sam
> > + /* We have a source in a conversion */
> > + src_alu_type =
> > + nir_get_nir_type_for_glsl_type(
> > + vtn_value(b, w[4], vtn_value_type_constant)-
> > >const_type);
> > + /* We use the bitsize of the conversion source to
> > evaluate the opcode later */
> > + bit_size = glsl_get_bit_size(
> > + vtn_value(b, w[4], vtn_value_type_constant)-
> > >const_type);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + bit_size = glsl_get_bit_size(val->const_type);
> > + };
> > +
> > +
> > + nir_op op = vtn_nir_alu_op_for_spirv_opcode(opcode,
> > &swap, src_alu_type, dst_alu_type);
> > + nir_const_value src[4];
> > +
> > for (unsigned i = 0; i < count - 4; i++) {
> > nir_constant *c =
> > vtn_value(b, w[4 + i], vtn_value_type_constant)-
> > >constant;
> >
>
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list