[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 03/25] threads: update for late C11 changes
Nicolai Hähnle
nhaehnle at gmail.com
Mon Oct 23 11:20:22 UTC 2017
On 23.10.2017 13:15, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Hi Nicolai,
>
> On 22 October 2017 at 20:07, Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle at amd.com>
>>
>> C11 threads were changed to use struct timespec instead of xtime, and
>> thrd_sleep got a second argument.
>>
> As xtime was replaced with timespec there's a couple of odd bits in the code.
>
>
>> See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1554.htm and
>> http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/thread/{thrd_sleep,cnd_timedwait,mtx_timedlock}
>>
>> Note that cnd_timedwait is spec'd to be relative to TIME_UTC / CLOCK_REALTIME.
>>
>> Cc: Jose Fonseca <jfonseca at vmware.com>
>> ---
>> include/c11/threads.h | 11 -----------
>> include/c11/threads_posix.h | 39 +++++++++++++++------------------------
>> include/c11/threads_win32.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>> 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/c11/threads.h b/include/c11/threads.h
>> index 573348d8091..3c3f23a8ab8 100644
>> --- a/include/c11/threads.h
>> +++ b/include/c11/threads.h
>> @@ -23,42 +23,31 @@
>> * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT
>> * SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS OR ANYONE DISTRIBUTING THE SOFTWARE BE LIABLE
>> * FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
>> * ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
>> * DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
>> */
>> #ifndef EMULATED_THREADS_H_INCLUDED_
>> #define EMULATED_THREADS_H_INCLUDED_
>>
>> #include <time.h>
>> -#ifdef _MSC_VER
>> -#include <thr/xtimec.h> // for xtime
>> -#endif
>>
>> #ifndef TIME_UTC
>> #define TIME_UTC 1
>> #endif
>>
>> #include "c99_compat.h" /* for `inline` */
>>
>> /*---------------------------- types ----------------------------*/
>> typedef void (*tss_dtor_t)(void*);
>> typedef int (*thrd_start_t)(void*);
>>
>> -#ifndef _MSC_VER
>> -struct xtime {
>> - time_t sec;
>> - long nsec;
>> -};
>> -typedef struct xtime xtime;
>> -#endif
>> -
>
> We don't have a fall-back declaration of the struct, yet we use it
> below and provide a timespec_get() implementation.
> I'd imagine you haven't tested this on Windows (hence Jose in CC)?
Right on both counts, as I don't really have a way of testing on Windows.
> Quick search suggests that MSVC 2015 was the first one that introduces
> the struct and timespec_get.
>
> If we're safe as-is, please add a comment with some details - I'd
> imagine Jose had better knowledge in the area.
>
>
>> /*-------------------- 7.25.7 Time functions --------------------*/
>> // 7.25.6.1
>> +#if 0
> I'd just drop the hunk mentioning that timespec_get() is part of time.h
I wasn't sure when timespec_get was introduced, so I thought it safer to
keep it around for a while in case we run into systems where time.h
doesn't provide it.
I can add a comment, or remove it entirely if you think that's not a
concern.
Cheers,
Nicolai
>
>
> Thank
> Emil
>
--
Lerne, wie die Welt wirklich ist,
Aber vergiss niemals, wie sie sein sollte.
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list