[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] radeonsi/uvd: fix interlaced video buffer height alignment

Leo Liu leo.liu at amd.com
Tue Sep 12 15:32:40 UTC 2017



On 09/12/2017 11:23 AM, Christian König wrote:
> I don't think this is correct. A long long time ago I've came up with 
> this because the firmware didn't liked what you proposed below.
Since this change only affects 720p video, so I did quite a bit tests on 
720p video dec/enc, and haven't see any problem.

Can you point out some failed case?

>
> Instead we should rather fix the scaler to use the original 
> width/height of the video buffer and not the adjusted width/height of 
> the resources.
To be honest, I don't really want to touch here, that's why I sent this 
patch alone for RFC, and also why I was got workaround for OMX one year 
ago, but now encounter the same again, and it seems not easy to fix on 
the blit, since it's scaling, not like OMX case, I can use src rect for dst.

Regards,
Leo


>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> Am 12.09.2017 um 15:56 schrieb Leo Liu:
>> In code:
>>     template.height = align(tmpl->height / array_size, 
>> VL_MACROBLOCK_HEIGHT);
>>     ...
>>     template.height *= array_size;
>>
>> It turns out the height will be aligned with 2*VL_MACROBLOCK_HEIGHT.
>> The problematic case for example is when VA-API postproc scaling with
>> blit between interlaced buffers, if the size is 720 in height, it will
>> be actually scaled to 736 in height, so the scaled video will crop out
>> the extra 16 lines of height.
>>
>> Another example is when deint with 720p video from interlaced buffer
>> to progressive buffer. This problem happened on OMX, and got workaround
>> with patch:
>>
>> (0c374a777 st/omx/dec: set dst rect to match src size
>>
>> When creating interlaced video buffer, hegith set to "template.height =
>> align(tmpl->height/ array_size, VL_MACROBLOCK_HEIGHT);", and we use
>> "template.height *= array_size;" for the buffer height, so it actually
>> aligned with 32. With progressive video buffer it still aligned with 16,
>> thus causing different height between interlaced buffer and progressive
>> buffer for 4K (height=2160), and 720p (height=720).
>>
>> When transcode the video, this will cause the 16 lines corruption
>> at the bottom of the encode video.)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu at amd.com>
>> ---
>>   src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_uvd.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_uvd.c 
>> b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_uvd.c
>> index 2441ad248c..e4c55c20e1 100644
>> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_uvd.c
>> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_uvd.c
>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct pipe_video_buffer 
>> *si_video_buffer_create(struct pipe_context *pipe,
>>       array_size = tmpl->interlaced ? 2 : 1;
>>       template = *tmpl;
>>       template.width = align(tmpl->width, VL_MACROBLOCK_WIDTH);
>> -    template.height = align(tmpl->height / array_size, 
>> VL_MACROBLOCK_HEIGHT);
>> +    template.height = align(tmpl->height, VL_MACROBLOCK_HEIGHT) / 
>> array_size;
>>         vl_video_buffer_template(&templ, &template, 
>> resource_formats[0], 1, array_size, PIPE_USAGE_DEFAULT, 0);
>>       /* TODO: get tiling working */
>
>



More information about the mesa-dev mailing list