[Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 4/8] egl: rework input validation order in _eglCreateWindowSurfaceCommon

Juan A. Suarez Romero jasuarez at igalia.com
Wed Sep 27 15:36:55 UTC 2017


On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 16:15 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 26 September 2017 at 18:08, Juan A. Suarez Romero
> <jasuarez at igalia.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:07 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > > On 5 August 2017 at 00:25, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
> > > > 
> > > > As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
> > > > arguments to be evaluated in particular order.
> > > > 
> > > > Namely - first the dpy, then the config, followed by the surface/window.
> > > > 
> > > > Move the check further down or executing the test below will produce
> > > > the following error.
> > > > 
> > > >    dEQP-EGL.functional.negative_api.create_pbuffer_surface
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >    <Section Name="Test2" Description="EGL_BAD_CONFIG is generated if config is not an EGL frame buffer configuration">
> > > >       <Text>eglCreateWindowSurface(0x9bfff0f150, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0000000000000000, { EGL_NONE });</Text>
> > > >       <Text>// 0x0000000000000000 returned</Text>
> > > >       <Text>// ERROR expected: EGL_BAD_CONFIG, Got: EGL_BAD_NATIVE_WINDOW</Text>
> > > >    </Section>
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > FTR dEQP has been "fixed" (by removing the test all together) to not
> > > generate the above error. At the same the Pixman equivalent is still
> > > buggy, hence the v2 of commit
> > > df8efd5b74d45e2bfb977a92dcd3db86abd6b143.
> > > 
> > 
> > Emil, does it mean this patch is superseded? I'm interesting in knowing
> > the situation as this was tagged to be included in stable release.
> > 
> 
> I'd like to keep this open and eventually merge it.
> The dEQP patches need 'a bit' of polishing.
> 

Sure. I'll skip it for next release. Thanks

	J.A.

> -Emil
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-stable mailing list
> mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list