[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 07/13] st/va: get mjpeg slice header
Boyuan Zhang
boyzhang at amd.com
Thu Aug 16 21:01:57 UTC 2018
On 2018-08-16 01:26 PM, Leo Liu wrote:
>
>
> On 08/16/2018 12:06 PM, boyuan.zhang at amd.com wrote:
>> From: Boyuan Zhang <boyuan.zhang at amd.com>
>>
>> Move the previous get_mjpeg_slice_header function from radeon/vcn to
>> st/va.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boyuan Zhang <boyuan.zhang at amd.com>
>> ---
>> src/gallium/state_trackers/va/picture.c | 3 +
>> src/gallium/state_trackers/va/picture_mjpeg.c | 132
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> src/gallium/state_trackers/va/va_private.h | 3 +
>> 3 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/picture.c
>> b/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/picture.c
>> index f2e9ba8..d326ed4 100644
>> --- a/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/picture.c
>> +++ b/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/picture.c
>> @@ -293,6 +293,9 @@ handleVASliceDataBufferType(vlVaContext *context,
>> vlVaBuffer *buf)
>> sizes[num_buffers++] = context->mpeg4.start_code_size;
>> break;
>> case PIPE_VIDEO_FORMAT_JPEG:
>> + vlVaGetJpegSliceHeader(context);
>> + buffers[num_buffers] = (void *)context->mjpeg.slice_header;
>> + sizes[num_buffers++] = context->mjpeg.slice_header_size;
>> break;
>> default:
>> break;
>> diff --git a/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/picture_mjpeg.c
>> b/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/picture_mjpeg.c
>> index 396b743..f1292ea 100644
>> --- a/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/picture_mjpeg.c
>> +++ b/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/picture_mjpeg.c
>> @@ -114,3 +114,135 @@ void
>> vlVaHandleSliceParameterBufferMJPEG(vlVaContext *context, vlVaBuffer
>> *buf)
>> context->desc.mjpeg.slice_parameter.restart_interval =
>> mjpeg->restart_interval;
>> context->desc.mjpeg.slice_parameter.num_mcus = mjpeg->num_mcus;
>> }
>> +
>> +void vlVaGetJpegSliceHeader(vlVaContext *context)
>> +{
>> + int size = 0, saved_size, len_pos, i;
>> + uint16_t *bs;
>> + uint8_t *p = context->mjpeg.slice_header;
>> +
>> + /* SOI */
>> + p[size++] = 0xff;
>> + p[size++] = 0xd8;
>> +
>> + /* DQT */
>> + p[size++] = 0xff;
>> + p[size++] = 0xdb;
>> +
>> + len_pos = size++;
>> + size++;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
>> + if
>> (context->desc.mjpeg.quantization_table.load_quantiser_table[i] == 0)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + p[size++] = i;
>> + memcpy((p + size),
>> &context->desc.mjpeg.quantization_table.quantiser_table[i], 64);
>> + size += 64;
>> + }
>> +
>> + bs = (uint16_t*)&p[len_pos];
>> + *bs = util_bswap16(size - 4);
>> +
>> + saved_size = size;
>> +
>> + /* DHT */
>> + p[size++] = 0xff;
>> + p[size++] = 0xc4;
>> +
>> + len_pos = size++;
>> + size++;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
>> + if (context->desc.mjpeg.huffman_table.load_huffman_table[i] == 0)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + p[size++] = 0x00 | i;
>> + memcpy((p + size),
>> &context->desc.mjpeg.huffman_table.table[i].num_dc_codes, 16);
>> + size += 16;
>> + memcpy((p + size),
>> &context->desc.mjpeg.huffman_table.table[i].dc_values, 12);
>> + size += 12;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
>> + if (context->desc.mjpeg.huffman_table.load_huffman_table[i] == 0)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + p[size++] = 0x10 | i;
>> + memcpy((p + size),
>> &context->desc.mjpeg.huffman_table.table[i].num_ac_codes, 16);
>> + size += 16;
>> + memcpy((p + size),
>> &context->desc.mjpeg.huffman_table.table[i].ac_values, 162);
>> + size += 162;
>> + }
>> +
>> + bs = (uint16_t*)&p[len_pos];
>> + *bs = util_bswap16(size - saved_size - 2);
>> +
>> + saved_size = size;
>> +
>> + /* DRI */
>> + if (context->desc.mjpeg.slice_parameter.restart_interval) {
>> + p[size++] = 0xff;
>> + p[size++] = 0xdd;
>> + p[size++] = 0x00;
>> + p[size++] = 0x04;
>> + bs = (uint16_t*)&p[size++];
>> + *bs =
>> util_bswap16(context->desc.mjpeg.slice_parameter.restart_interval);
>> + saved_size = ++size;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* SOF */
>> + p[size++] = 0xff;
>> + p[size++] = 0xc0;
>> +
>> + len_pos = size++;
>> + size++;
>> +
>> + p[size++] = 0x08;
>> +
>> + bs = (uint16_t*)&p[size++];
>> + *bs =
>> util_bswap16(context->desc.mjpeg.picture_parameter.picture_height);
>> + size++;
>> +
>> + bs = (uint16_t*)&p[size++];
>> + *bs =
>> util_bswap16(context->desc.mjpeg.picture_parameter.picture_width);
>> + size++;
>> +
>> + p[size++] = context->desc.mjpeg.picture_parameter.num_components;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i <
>> context->desc.mjpeg.picture_parameter.num_components; ++i) {
>> + p[size++] =
>> context->desc.mjpeg.picture_parameter.components[i].component_id;
>> + p[size++] =
>> context->desc.mjpeg.picture_parameter.components[i].h_sampling_factor
>> << 4 |
>> + context->desc.mjpeg.picture_parameter.components[i].v_sampling_factor;
>> + p[size++] =
>> context->desc.mjpeg.picture_parameter.components[i].quantiser_table_selector;
>> + }
>> +
>> + bs = (uint16_t*)&p[len_pos];
>> + *bs = util_bswap16(size - saved_size - 2);
>> +
>> + saved_size = size;
>> +
>> + /* SOS */
>> + p[size++] = 0xff;
>> + p[size++] = 0xda;
>> +
>> + len_pos = size++;
>> + size++;
>> +
>> + p[size++] = context->desc.mjpeg.slice_parameter.num_components;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i <
>> context->desc.mjpeg.slice_parameter.num_components; ++i) {
>> + p[size++] =
>> context->desc.mjpeg.slice_parameter.components[i].component_selector;
>> + p[size++] =
>> context->desc.mjpeg.slice_parameter.components[i].dc_table_selector
>> << 4 |
>> + context->desc.mjpeg.slice_parameter.components[i].ac_table_selector;
>> + }
>> +
>> + p[size++] = 0x00;
>> + p[size++] = 0x3f;
>> + p[size++] = 0x00;
>> +
>> + bs = (uint16_t*)&p[len_pos];
>> + *bs = util_bswap16(size - saved_size - 2);
>> +
>> + context->mjpeg.slice_header_size = size;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/va_private.h
>> b/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/va_private.h
>> index 4396abb..a40dd79 100644
>> --- a/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/va_private.h
>> +++ b/src/gallium/state_trackers/va/va_private.h
>> @@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ typedef struct {
>> struct {
>> unsigned sampling_factor;
>> + uint8_t slice_header[1488];
> Can this number cover the largest case number for all being parsed
> markers?
> It would be better if we can list the largest size for the marker in
> Macro, and then add them together.
>
> Regards,
> Leo
Yes, Using Macro for the calculation is more clear. Please see the new
Patch#7 just sent.
Regards,
Boyuan
>
>
>> + unsigned int slice_header_size;
>> } mjpeg;
>> struct vl_deint_filter *deint;
>> @@ -421,6 +423,7 @@ void
>> vlVaHandlePictureParameterBufferMPEG4(vlVaDriver *drv, vlVaContext
>> *context
>> void vlVaHandleIQMatrixBufferMPEG4(vlVaContext *context, vlVaBuffer
>> *buf);
>> void vlVaHandleSliceParameterBufferMPEG4(vlVaContext *context,
>> vlVaBuffer *buf);
>> void vlVaDecoderFixMPEG4Startcode(vlVaContext *context);
>> +void vlVaGetJpegSliceHeader(vlVaContext *context);
>> void vlVaHandlePictureParameterBufferHEVC(vlVaDriver *drv,
>> vlVaContext *context, vlVaBuffer *buf);
>> void vlVaHandleIQMatrixBufferHEVC(vlVaContext *context, vlVaBuffer
>> *buf);
>> void vlVaHandleSliceParameterBufferHEVC(vlVaContext *context,
>> vlVaBuffer *buf);
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list