[Mesa-dev] Lets talk about autotools
Kristian Høgsberg
hoegsberg at gmail.com
Mon Dec 3 18:42:49 UTC 2018
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:28 AM Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 17:49, Dylan Baker <dylan at pnwbakers.com> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-12-03 07:54:38)
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 17:44, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I can see why people may opt to not use or maintain the autotools build.
> > > > Although I would kindly ask that we do not remove it just yet.
> > > >
> > > > In Mesa, we have different parts not used by different teams. As such
> > > > we tend to remove stuff when nobody is around to maintain it anymore.
> > > >
> > > > That said, I'm planning to continue maintaining it and would appreciate
> > > > if we keep it in-tree.
> > > >
> > > > As people may be concerned about bugreports and alike we can trivially
> > > > add a warning (as configure is invoked) to forwards any issues to my
> > > > email. Additionally (or alternatively) we can have an autotools bugzilla
> > > > category with me as the default assignee.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Seems like I failed to make things clear enough with earlier message.
> > >
> > > There is _no_ expectation for anyone to touch or even look at autotools.
> > > Hence, my suggestion to have configure.ac point people to me in case of issues.
> > >
> > > If people have CI that uses it - feel free to drop it.
> > >
> >
> > I've tried to stay out of this discussion, because everyone knows my opinion,
> > and I feel I don't have much to add, however...
> >
> > >
> > > That said, many have asked why I'd go through the pain of maintaining it:
> > > - Most Linux distributions have switched, but there'still a few outstanding
> > > - Non Linux distributions have not switched
> >
> > Haiku has at least :)
> >
> \o/
>
> > > - The meson build is missing features, relative the autotools one
> >
> > The only feature that I know that meson does not have relative to autotools is
> > the gl mangling stuff (which is intentional, we'll add it if someone shows up
> > with a need for it). Everything else is either intentionally not implemented
> > (GLX TLS toggling for example, which meson hardcodes on for OSes that support
> > it, and off for those that don't).
> >
> On top of the TLS and symbol mangling (for which I agree) there is:
>
> - no CrOS support
> - static/shared mesa (or at least parts of) - Kitware guys are still using it
> - non-static gallium targets - yes it's intentionally 'hidden' in configure.ac
> - disable direct glx - non linux people use this
>
> I understand the reluctance on the latter two, yet leaving CrOS and
> Kitware in the cold seems strange.
We're mostly ready to switch, Chad's done the work to update the
ebuilds and sdk. Don't keep autotools on account of us - excited to
see this work mature.
Kristian
>
> > > - I've been approached by individuals, who cannot quite yet use meson
> >
> > At this point we've been very clear of our intentions to move to meson, as Matt
> > said I have worked very hard to resolve any issues developers and users have had
> > (and have spent a lot of time booting VM's and fixing meson and mesa's meson
> > build on non-linux OSes) or reported, but we can't resolve issues that aren't
> > reported. If people are having issues using meson and they're not filing a bug
> > with meson or with mesa, or mailing the list, or getting on IRC, there is
> > nothing we can do for them, and at some point they need to speak up, or accept
> > things.
> >
> As the Mesa community grows, the amount of discussions/patches we
> produce is quite intimidating.
>
> Over the years, I've been reaching out to distributions and
> maintainers, many of which doing this as a hobby, to ease their mind.
>
> Your point is valid - issues should be brought forward. Although
> without encouragement things are hard sometimes.
>
> Thanks
> -Emil
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list