[Mesa-dev] Lets talk about autotools
Timo Aaltonen
tjaalton at ubuntu.com
Mon Dec 3 19:03:59 UTC 2018
On 3.12.2018 20.54, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Quoting Timo Aaltonen (2018-12-03 10:36:12)
>> On 3.12.2018 20.25, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 17:49, Dylan Baker <dylan at pnwbakers.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-12-03 07:54:38)
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 17:44, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can see why people may opt to not use or maintain the autotools build.
>>>>>> Although I would kindly ask that we do not remove it just yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In Mesa, we have different parts not used by different teams. As such
>>>>>> we tend to remove stuff when nobody is around to maintain it anymore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That said, I'm planning to continue maintaining it and would appreciate
>>>>>> if we keep it in-tree.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As people may be concerned about bugreports and alike we can trivially
>>>>>> add a warning (as configure is invoked) to forwards any issues to my
>>>>>> email. Additionally (or alternatively) we can have an autotools bugzilla
>>>>>> category with me as the default assignee.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems like I failed to make things clear enough with earlier message.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is _no_ expectation for anyone to touch or even look at autotools.
>>>>> Hence, my suggestion to have configure.ac point people to me in case of issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> If people have CI that uses it - feel free to drop it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've tried to stay out of this discussion, because everyone knows my opinion,
>>>> and I feel I don't have much to add, however...
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That said, many have asked why I'd go through the pain of maintaining it:
>>>>> - Most Linux distributions have switched, but there'still a few outstanding
>>>>> - Non Linux distributions have not switched
>>>>
>>>> Haiku has at least :)
>>>>
>>> \o/
>>
>> And Debian too (in experimental). Ubuntu will follow once the final is
>> out and it build everywhere. There's a build failure on ppc64el, btw:
>>
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=mesa&arch=ppc64el&ver=18.3.0%7Erc5-1&stamp=1543575640&raw=0
>>
>>>>> - The meson build is missing features, relative the autotools one
>>>>
>>>> The only feature that I know that meson does not have relative to autotools is
>>>> the gl mangling stuff (which is intentional, we'll add it if someone shows up
>>>> with a need for it). Everything else is either intentionally not implemented
>>>> (GLX TLS toggling for example, which meson hardcodes on for OSes that support
>>>> it, and off for those that don't).
>>>>
>>> On top of the TLS and symbol mangling (for which I agree) there is:
>>> - disable direct glx - non linux people use this
>>
>> This seems to work, at least on Hurd:
>>
>> diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
>> index 33f4e5ad3cf..90cc0bb3af2 100644
>> --- a/meson.build
>> +++ b/meson.build
>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ with_tests = get_option('build-tests')
>> with_valgrind = get_option('valgrind')
>> with_libunwind = get_option('libunwind')
>> with_asm = get_option('asm')
>> +with_glx_direct= get_option('glx-direct')
>> with_glx_read_only_text = get_option('glx-read-only-text')
>> with_osmesa = get_option('osmesa')
>> with_swr_arches = get_option('swr-arches')
>> @@ -370,9 +371,6 @@ if with_glvnd
>> endif
>> endif
>>
>> -# TODO: toggle for this
>> -with_glx_direct = true
>> -
>> if with_vulkan_icd_dir == ''
>> with_vulkan_icd_dir = join_paths(get_option('datadir'), 'vulkan/icd.d')
>> endif
>> diff --git a/meson_options.txt b/meson_options.txt
>> index a1d5ab0e185..4d5f36bf33d 100644
>> --- a/meson_options.txt
>> +++ b/meson_options.txt
>> @@ -205,6 +205,12 @@ option(
>> choices : ['auto', 'disabled', 'dri', 'xlib', 'gallium-xlib'],
>> description : 'Build support for GLX platform'
>> )
>> +option(
>> + 'glx-direct',
>> + type : 'boolean',
>> + value : 'true',
>> + description : 'Enable direct rendering in GLX and EGL for DRI'
>> +)
>> option(
>> 'egl',
>> type : 'combo',
>>
>>
>
> I'm glad that this actually worked :) I tried to wire up direct glx so adding a
> toggle would be easy if we needed it. Do you need this for Hurd Timo?
Yep, it also needs -D_GNU_SOURCE which hopefully is fixed by this:
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ if cc.compiles('int foo(void) __attribut
endif
# TODO: this is very incomplete
-if ['linux', 'cygwin'].contains(host_machine.system())
+if ['linux', 'linux-gnu', 'cygwin', 'gnu'].contains(host_machine.system())
pre_args += '-D_GNU_SOURCE'
endif
(to match configure.ac)
And that ppc64el build fail might be because it for some reason doesn't seem to get -DUSE_PPC64LE_ASM..
--
t
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20181203/e6134085/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list