[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] anv/android: handle storage images in vkGetSwapchainGrallocUsageANDROID

Tapani Pälli tapani.palli at intel.com
Wed Dec 5 11:37:22 UTC 2018



On 12/5/18 1:22 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 12:15 PM Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/5/18 1:01 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 12:54 AM Kevin Strasser <kevin.strasser at intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Android P and earlier expect that the surface supports storage images, and
>>>> so many of the tests fail when the framework checks for that support. The
>>>> framework also includes various image format and usage combinations that are
>>>> invalid for the hardware.
>>>>
>>>> Drop the STORAGE restriction from the HAL and whitelist a pair of
>>>> formats so that existing versions of Android can pass these tests.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes:
>>>>      dEQP-VK.wsi.android.*
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Strasser <kevin.strasser at intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    src/intel/vulkan/anv_android.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
>>>>    1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_android.c b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_android.c
>>>> index 46c41d5..e2640b8 100644
>>>> --- a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_android.c
>>>> +++ b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_android.c
>>>> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ VkResult anv_GetSwapchainGrallocUsageANDROID(
>>>>       *grallocUsage = 0;
>>>>       intel_logd("%s: format=%d, usage=0x%x", __func__, format, imageUsage);
>>>>
>>>> -   /* WARNING: Android Nougat's libvulkan.so hardcodes the VkImageUsageFlags
>>>> +   /* WARNING: Android's libvulkan.so hardcodes the VkImageUsageFlags
>>>>        * returned to applications via VkSurfaceCapabilitiesKHR::supportedUsageFlags.
>>>>        * The relevant code in libvulkan/swapchain.cpp contains this fun comment:
>>>>        *
>>>> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ VkResult anv_GetSwapchainGrallocUsageANDROID(
>>>>        * dEQP-VK.wsi.android.swapchain.*.image_usage to fail.
>>>>        */
>>>>
>>>> -   const VkPhysicalDeviceImageFormatInfo2KHR image_format_info = {
>>>> +   VkPhysicalDeviceImageFormatInfo2KHR image_format_info = {
>>>
>>> Why remove the const here?
>>>
>>>>          .sType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_PHYSICAL_DEVICE_IMAGE_FORMAT_INFO_2_KHR,
>>>>          .format = format,
>>>>          .type = VK_IMAGE_TYPE_2D,
>>>> @@ -255,6 +255,17 @@ VkResult anv_GetSwapchainGrallocUsageANDROID(
>>>>          .usage = imageUsage,
>>>>       };
>>>>
>>>> +   /* Android P and earlier doesn't check if the physical device supports a
>>>> +    * given format and usage combination before calling this function. Omit the
>>>> +    * storage requirement to make the tests pass.
>>>> +    */
>>>> +#if ANDROID_API_LEVEL <= 28
>>>> +   if (format == VK_FORMAT_R8G8B8A8_SRGB ||
>>>> +       format == VK_FORMAT_R5G6B5_UNORM_PACK16) {
>>>> +      image_format_info.usage &= ~VK_IMAGE_USAGE_STORAGE_BIT;
>>>> +   }
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> I don't think you need this. Per the vulkan spec you can only use an
>>> format + usage combination for a swapchain if it is supported per
>>> ImageFormatProperties, using essentially the same check happening
>>> above. I know CTs has been bad at this, but Vulkan CTS should have
>>> been fixed for a bit now. (I don't think all the fixes are in Android
>>> CTS 9.0_r4 yet, maybe the next release?)
>>
>> AFAIK the problem here is not about CTS. It's the swapchain
>> implementation that always requires storage support.
> 
> Actually swapchain creation has the following valid usage rule:
> 
> "The implied image creation parameters of the swapchain must be
> supported as reported by vkGetPhysicalDeviceImageFormatProperties"
> 
> So since those formats don't support the STORAGE usage bit, that test
> fails and you are not allowed to create a swapchain with those formats
> and storage, even if the surface capabiliities expose the STORAGE
> usage bit in general.

Right ... this stuff was done because comment in the swapchain setting 
the bits seems like maybe it's not thought through:

// TODO(jessehall): I think these are right, but haven't thought hard about
// it. Do we need to query the driver for support of any of these?

>>
>>> (Also silently removing the usage bit is bad, because the app could
>>> try actually using images stores with the image ...)
>>
>> True, it is not nice ..
>>
>>
>>>> +
>>>>       VkImageFormatProperties2KHR image_format_props = {
>>>>          .sType = VK_STRUCTURE_TYPE_IMAGE_FORMAT_PROPERTIES_2_KHR,
>>>>       };
>>>> @@ -268,19 +279,13 @@ VkResult anv_GetSwapchainGrallocUsageANDROID(
>>>>                           "inside %s", __func__);
>>>>       }
>>>>
>>>> -   /* Reject STORAGE here to avoid complexity elsewhere. */
>>>> -   if (imageUsage & VK_IMAGE_USAGE_STORAGE_BIT) {
>>>> -      return vk_errorf(device->instance, device, VK_ERROR_FORMAT_NOT_SUPPORTED,
>>>> -                       "VK_IMAGE_USAGE_STORAGE_BIT unsupported for gralloc "
>>>> -                       "swapchain");
>>>> -   }
>>>> -
>>>>       if (unmask32(&imageUsage, VK_IMAGE_USAGE_TRANSFER_DST_BIT |
>>>>                                 VK_IMAGE_USAGE_COLOR_ATTACHMENT_BIT))
>>>>          *grallocUsage |= GRALLOC_USAGE_HW_RENDER;
>>>>
>>>>       if (unmask32(&imageUsage, VK_IMAGE_USAGE_TRANSFER_SRC_BIT |
>>>>                                 VK_IMAGE_USAGE_SAMPLED_BIT |
>>>> +                             VK_IMAGE_USAGE_STORAGE_BIT |
>>>>                                 VK_IMAGE_USAGE_INPUT_ATTACHMENT_BIT))
>>>>          *grallocUsage |= GRALLOC_USAGE_HW_TEXTURE;
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.7.4
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mesa-dev mailing list
>>>> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mesa-dev mailing list
>>> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>>>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list