[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 08/15] glsl: Switch ast_type_qualifier to a 128-bit bitset.
Francisco Jerez
currojerez at riseup.net
Tue Feb 27 18:58:27 UTC 2018
Thanks for testing. I'm going to land the build fix with your
Tested-by's if nobody raises any concerns in the next 24h.
"Kyriazis, George" <george.kyriazis at intel.com> writes:
> It also fixes the errors that I was getting with gcc 5.4.0 with configure build on ubuntu 16.04.
>
> Tested-By: George Kyriazis <george.kyriazis at intel.com<mailto:george.kyriazis at intel.com>>
>
> On Feb 25, 2018, at 6:52 PM, Roland Scheidegger <sroland at vmware.com<mailto:sroland at vmware.com>> wrote:
>
> Am 25.02.2018 um 21:12 schrieb Francisco Jerez:
> Roland Scheidegger <sroland at vmware.com<mailto:sroland at vmware.com>> writes:
>
> Am 25.02.2018 um 03:35 schrieb Francisco Jerez:
> Roland Scheidegger <sroland at vmware.com<mailto:sroland at vmware.com>> writes:
>
> This seems to have broken compilation with some gcc versions (with scons
> build):
>
> In file included from src/compiler/glsl/ast_array_index.cpp:24:0:
> src/compiler/glsl/ast.h:648:16: error: member
> ‘ast_type_qualifier::bitset_t ast_type_qualifier::flags::i’ with
> constructor not allowed in union
> bitset_t i;
> ^
>
> Oops... And the only reason bitset_t has a default constructor was...
> to avoid using another C++11 feature (defaulted member functions).
> Does the attached patch fix the build failure for you? The cleaner
> alternative would be to define the default constructor of the bitset
> object like 'T() = default', but that would imply dropping support for
> GCC 4.2-4.3 which don't implement the feature...
>
> FWIW the compile error was happening with gcc 4.8 - I didn't see it with
> gcc 5.4.
> (I don't think at vmware we'd care about anything older than gcc 4.4 at
> least but last time someone wanted to bump gcc requirements there were
> still people requiring gcc 4.2.)
>
> The patch compiles albeit there's about two dozen warnings like the
> following:
> glsl/ast_type.cpp: In member function 'bool
> ast_fully_specified_type::has_qualifiers(_mesa_glsl_parse_state*) const':
> glsl/ast_type.cpp:50:67: warning: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous,
> even though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst
> conversion for the second: [enabled by default]
> return (this->qualifier.flags.i & ~subroutine_only.flags.i) != 0;
> ^
> In file included from glsl/ast.h:31:0,
> from glsl/ast_type.cpp:24:
> ../../src/util/bitset.h:181:7: note: candidate 1: bool operator!=(const
> ast_type_qualifier::bitset_t&, unsigned int)
> operator!=(const T &b, BITSET_WORD x) \
> ^
> glsl/ast.h:477:4: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLARE_BITSET_T'
> DECLARE_BITSET_T(bitset_t, 128);
> ^
> glsl/ast_type.cpp:50:67: note: candidate 2: operator!=(int, int) <built-in>
> return (this->qualifier.flags.i & ~subroutine_only.flags.i) != 0;
> ^
> Roland
>
>
> Ah, yeah, that's because I didn't provide overloads for signed integer
> types, but it should be harmless since the two candidates have the same
> semantics, and should go away with a C++11-capable compiler. I think
> the attached patch should shut the warnings on older compilers.
>
> Yes, that compiles without warnings (with gcc 4.8)
> Tested-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland at vmware.com<mailto:sroland at vmware.com>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> src/compiler/glsl/ast.h:648:16: note: unrestricted unions only available
> with -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11
> scons: *** [build/linux-x86_64-checked/compiler/glsl/ast_array_index.os]
> Error 1
> src/gallium/tests/unit/u_format_test.c: In function ‘main’:
> src/gallium/tests/unit/u_format_test.c:649:44: warning: array subscript
> is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
> unpacked[i][j] = test->unpacked[i][j][1];
> ^
> In file included from src/compiler/glsl/ast_expr.cpp:24:0:
> src/compiler/glsl/ast.h:648:16: error: member
> ‘ast_type_qualifier::bitset_t ast_type_qualifier::flags::i’ with
> constructor not allowed in union
> bitset_t i;
> ^
> src/compiler/glsl/ast.h:648:16: note: unrestricted unions only available
> with -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11
>
> Roland
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org>
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20180227/0f9084cf/attachment.sig>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list