[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] nir: fix divide by zero crash during constant folding
Timothy Arceri
tarceri at itsqueeze.com
Wed Feb 28 03:20:01 UTC 2018
On 28/02/18 14:13, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On February 27, 2018 19:11:49 Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net> wrote:
>
>> On February 27, 2018 19:07:43 Timothy Arceri <tarceri at itsqueeze.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> From the GLSL 4.60 spec Section 5.9 (Expressions):
>>>
>>> "Dividing by zero does not cause an exception but does result in
>>> an unspecified value."
>>>
>>> Fixes: 89285e4d47a6 "nir: add new constant folding infrastructure"
>>>
>>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105271
>>> ---
>>> src/compiler/nir/nir_opcodes.py | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_opcodes.py
>>> b/src/compiler/nir/nir_opcodes.py
>>> index 278562b2bd..dcc5b07d05 100644
>>> --- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_opcodes.py
>>> +++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_opcodes.py
>>> @@ -403,9 +403,9 @@ binop("imul_high", tint32, commutative,
>>> binop("umul_high", tuint32, commutative,
>>> "(uint32_t)(((uint64_t) src0 * (uint64_t) src1) >> 32)")
>>>
>>> -binop("fdiv", tfloat, "", "src0 / src1")
>>> -binop("idiv", tint, "", "src0 / src1")
>>> -binop("udiv", tuint, "", "src0 / src1")
>>> +binop("fdiv", tfloat, "", "src1 == 0 ? 0 : (src0 / src1)")
>>
>> Should this return inf?
>
> Or maybe an unsignaling NaN? I'm not really sure.
I'm not sure. GLSL IR doesn't even try to catch this currently.
>
>>> +binop("idiv", tint, "", "src1 == 0 ? 0 : (src0 / src1)")
>>> +binop("udiv", tuint, "", "src1 == 0 ? 0 : (src0 / src1)")
>>>
>>> # returns a boolean representing the carry resulting from the
>>> addition of
>>> # the two unsigned arguments.
>>> --
>>> 2.14.3
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mesa-dev mailing list
>>> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list