[Mesa-dev] [PATCH shaderdb 1/2] run: fall back to v3.1 core ctx if v3.2 fails

Rob Clark robdclark at gmail.com
Sun Jan 28 16:24:08 UTC 2018


On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 9:07 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  run.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/run.c b/run.c
>>>> index 69fe23d..20a0a6a 100644
>>>> --- a/run.c
>>>> +++ b/run.c
>>>> @@ -520,6 +520,18 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>>      };
>>>>      EGLContext core_ctx = eglCreateContext(egl_dpy, cfg, EGL_NO_CONTEXT,
>>>>                                             attribs);
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (core_ctx == EGL_NO_CONTEXT) {
>>>> +        static const EGLint attribs_31[] = {
>>>> +            EGL_CONTEXT_OPENGL_PROFILE_MASK_KHR,
>>>> +            EGL_CONTEXT_OPENGL_CORE_PROFILE_BIT_KHR,
>>>
>>> Profiles are only introduced in v3.2. I can't see how this can work.
>>>
>>
>> entirely possible by accident.. not quite sure when shader-db started
>> asking for 3.2 core profile, but that broke things for freedreno (and
>> this patch "fixed" things)
>
> Must have never worked. run.c created core profiles from its inception.

Hmm, I could be wrong then.. I *thought* glsl 140 shaders worked at some point.

So then, how *does* one create a 3.1 core context?  Since atm compat
context only exposes 3.0.

BR,
-R


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list