[Mesa-dev] [PATCH mesa 1/2] meson: centralise the libdrm versions information

Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Tue Jan 30 18:43:06 UTC 2018


On 29 January 2018 at 18:57, Dylan Baker <dylan at pnwbakers.com> wrote:
> Quoting Eric Engestrom (2018-01-29 10:15:50)
>> The big comment is taken from the equivalent block in configure.ac
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom at imgtec.com>
>> ---
>>  meson.build                                 | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>  src/gallium/targets/d3dadapter9/meson.build |  2 +-
>>  src/mesa/drivers/dri/meson.build            |  2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
>> index 0a00798c2a5093ec803b..6d7a8e976ff6ad002d9a 100644
>> --- a/meson.build
>> +++ b/meson.build
>> @@ -41,6 +41,20 @@ pre_args = [
>>    '-DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Mesa"',
>>  ]
>>
>> +# The idea is that libdrm is distributed as one cohesive package, even
>> +# though it is composed of multiple libraries. However some drivers
>> +# may have different version requirements than others. This list
>> +# codifies which drivers need which version of libdrm. Any libdrm
>> +# version dependencies in non-driver-specific code should be reflected
>> +# in the first entry.
>> +libdrm_version           = '2.4.75'
>> +libdrm_amdgpu_version    = '2.4.89'
>> +libdrm_etnaviv_version   = '2.4.82'
>> +libdrm_freedreno_version = '2.4.82'
>> +libdrm_intel_version     = '2.4.75'
>> +libdrm_nouveau_version   = '2.4.66'
>> +libdrm_radeon_version    = '2.4.71'
>
> Is there any reason we can't just make these (for example):
> libdrm_radeon_version    = '>= 2.4.71'
>
> Since that avoids all of the format calls?
>
Is there particular reason why meson doesn't allow plain
concatenation, and one must go through the format dance?
Off the top of my head, I think that most higher level programming
languages (including python) have it, making for clearer and more
obvious code.

That aside:
A huge +1 from me on the idea, although the libdrm_foo checks should
become libdrm && libdrm_foo.
See commit 2b4eaabff01a3a8ea0c4742ac481492092c1ab4f.

Thanks
Emil


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list