[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] radv: Don't emit a warning on VI-GFX9.

[Samuel Pitoiset]

Yeah, without the '=' that's better :)

Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com>

On 03/07/2018 04:42 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> We are conformant:
> 
> https://www.khronos.org/conformance/adopters/conformant-products#submission_308
> 
> v2: Actually not emit it on gfx9.
> ---
>   src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c
> index 150cbdab2e..ffc00fa888 100644
> --- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c
> +++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c
> @@ -280,7 +280,9 @@ radv_physical_device_init(struct radv_physical_device *device,
>   	disk_cache_format_hex_id(buf, device->cache_uuid, VK_UUID_SIZE * 2);
>   	device->disk_cache = disk_cache_create(device->name, buf, shader_env_flags);
>   
> -	fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: radv is not a conformant vulkan implementation, testing use only.\n");
> +	if (device->rad_info.chip_class < VI ||
> +	    device->rad_info.chip_class > GFX9)
> +		fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: radv is not a conformant vulkan implementation, testing use only.\n");
>   
>   	radv_get_driver_uuid(&device->device_uuid);
>   	radv_get_device_uuid(&device->rad_info, &device->device_uuid);
>