[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 04/56] anv/entrypoints: Generalize the string map a bit

Ilia Mirkin imirkin at alum.mit.edu
Thu Mar 8 16:59:12 UTC 2018


On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Dylan Baker <dylan at pnwbakers.com> wrote:
> Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2018-03-07 20:22:51)
>> Yes, that is what happened.  That said, wrote that patch in September and
>> you've had about 6 months to look at it.  The only particularly active Mesa
>> contributor who hasn't had access is Ilia.

[And there was no particular reason for me to review these as I am not
involved in Intel development, and am fairly weak on Vulkan in the
first place.]

> The understanding has always been that patches
> that are neither trivial nor fix a critical bug should be on list at least 24
> hours before being pushed, even after receiving a review.

I push stuff pretty much immediately after receiving any review. First
I hear of a 24-hour rule. I even push stuff that never got review (but
almost always sat on list in some form for a bit), but only inside of
nouveau -- probably not OK for drivers with active multi-person teams.

For patches that substantially affect lots of drivers (either directly
via code, or indirectly via being a shared component that sits in
front of the drivers), it's good to ensure that all the driver
maintainers are able to provide feedback, for which a 24 hour period
ought to be sufficient. But for patches within a driver, I don't think
that's particularly required.

Some patches did affect radv, and (iirc) Bas provided feedback on
(some) of those (and I believe the two teams had been working together
previously).

FWIW, I don't really perceive any process issue in this case.

It sucks when you notice an issue and the patch has already been
pushed, but it happens. Not such a big deal.

  -ilia


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list