[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 09/10] i965/miptree: Move the access_raw call to the individual map functions

Jason Ekstrand jason at jlekstrand.net
Fri May 11 23:48:25 UTC 2018


The only function that doesn't need to call access_raw is map_blit.  If
it takes the blitter path, it will happen as part of intel_miptree_copy.
If map_blit takes the blorp path, no brw_blorp_copy_miptrees will handle
doing whatever resolves are needed.  This should save us resolves in
quite a few cases and will probably help performance a bit.
---
 src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
index 7c5e6f6..0bfc426 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
@@ -3109,6 +3109,9 @@ intel_miptree_map_gtt(struct brw_context *brw,
    y /= bh;
    x /= bw;
 
+   intel_miptree_access_raw(brw, mt, level, slice,
+                            map->mode & GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT);
+
    base = intel_miptree_map_raw(brw, mt, map->mode);
 
    if (base == NULL)
@@ -3247,6 +3250,8 @@ intel_miptree_map_movntdqa(struct brw_context *brw,
    assert(map->mode & GL_MAP_READ_BIT);
    assert(!(map->mode & GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT));
 
+   intel_miptree_access_raw(brw, mt, level, slice, false);
+
    DBG("%s: %d,%d %dx%d from mt %p (%s) %d,%d = %p/%d\n", __func__,
        map->x, map->y, map->w, map->h,
        mt, _mesa_get_format_name(mt->format),
@@ -3341,6 +3346,9 @@ intel_miptree_map_s8(struct brw_context *brw,
    if (!map->buffer)
       return;
 
+   intel_miptree_access_raw(brw, mt, level, slice,
+                            map->mode & GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT);
+
    /* One of either READ_BIT or WRITE_BIT or both is set.  READ_BIT implies no
     * INVALIDATE_RANGE_BIT.  WRITE_BIT needs the original values read in unless
     * invalidate is set, since we'll be writing the whole rectangle from our
@@ -3423,6 +3431,8 @@ intel_miptree_map_etc(struct brw_context *brw,
    assert(map->mode & GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT);
    assert(map->mode & GL_MAP_INVALIDATE_RANGE_BIT);
 
+   intel_miptree_access_raw(brw, mt, level, slice, true);
+
    map->stride = _mesa_format_row_stride(mt->etc_format, map->w);
    map->buffer = malloc(_mesa_format_image_size(mt->etc_format,
                                                 map->w, map->h, 1));
@@ -3516,6 +3526,9 @@ intel_miptree_map_depthstencil(struct brw_context *brw,
    if (!map->buffer)
       return;
 
+   intel_miptree_access_raw(brw, mt, level, slice,
+                            map->mode & GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT);
+
    /* One of either READ_BIT or WRITE_BIT or both is set.  READ_BIT implies no
     * INVALIDATE_RANGE_BIT.  WRITE_BIT needs the original values read in unless
     * invalidate is set, since we'll be writing the whole rectangle from our
@@ -3697,9 +3710,6 @@ intel_miptree_map(struct brw_context *brw,
       return;
    }
 
-   intel_miptree_access_raw(brw, mt, level, slice,
-                            map->mode & GL_MAP_WRITE_BIT);
-
    if (mt->format == MESA_FORMAT_S_UINT8) {
       intel_miptree_map_s8(brw, mt, map, level, slice);
    } else if (mt->etc_format != MESA_FORMAT_NONE &&
-- 
2.5.0.400.gff86faf



More information about the mesa-dev mailing list