[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] Add and enable extension EXT_sRGB_write_control

[Gert Wollny]

Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2018, 10:15 -0400 schrieb Ilia Mirkin:
> So ... thinking about this a little more ... how is the new enable
> different from the existing "EXT_framebuffer_sRGB" enable? When would
> one be set but not the other?

This one is a GLES extension, there, if the surface attached to a
framebuffer is sRGB capable, it behaves always like
glEnable(GL_FRAMEBUFFER_SRGB) is set. With this extension, control is
given back to the application. To keep compatibility, the default is
still the same behaviour as without the extension (which is different
from desktop GL).

Best, 
Gert 


> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 7:30 AM Gert Wollny <gw.fossdev at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > From: Gert Wollny <gert.wollny at collabora.com>
> > 
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > yet another update, only to the Gallium part: i.e. the format check
> > was
> > simplified according to Mareks comment,
> > 
> > Best,
> > Gert
> > 
> > 
> > Gert Wollny (3):
> >   mesa/core: Add support for EXT_sRGB_write_control
> >   mesa/st: enable EXT_sRGB_write_control for Gallium drivers that
> >     support it
> >   intel/i965: Enable extension EXT_sRGB_write_control
> > 
> >  src/gallium/docs/source/screen.rst           |  3 ++
> >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_extensions.c |  1 +
> >  src/mesa/main/enable.c                       |  4 +--
> >  src/mesa/main/extensions_table.h             |  1 +
> >  src/mesa/main/get.c                          |  5 +++
> >  src/mesa/main/get_hash_params.py             |  1 +
> >  src/mesa/main/mtypes.h                       |  1 +
> >  src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c       |  5 ++-
> >  src/mesa/state_tracker/st_manager.c          | 37 ++++++++++++--
> > ------
> >  9 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --
> > 2.18.1
> >