[Mesa-dev] new dispatch generator broke with Marek's parallel compile commit
Emil Velikov
emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Tue Apr 2 18:32:32 UTC 2019
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 12:43, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 04:55, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 11:24, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Marek's commit to add ARB_parallel_shader_compile broke some es1 tests
> > > in the Intel CI.
> > >
> > > It appears the whatever generates the es1api isn't consistent, for
> > > example glTranslatex on my local system is 1405 in es1api but is 1406
> > > in the gl api.
> > >
> > > I'm no expert on this area, Emil any ideas?
> >
> > This seems to be due the new registry xml parser, I'm not sure how
> > broken it is, but it seems like it's a bit busted, and nobody tested
> > the scenario where a new function gets introduced in the middle.
> >
> > It looks like static_data.py has a limit on the offsets it cares
> > about, I thought adding static offsets for these functions would help
> > here, but it appears currently it all just work by luck, that the
> > static offsets work out to be the same as ones generated by gl_XML.py
> > for values above MAX_OFFSETS.
> >
> > I've got a hacky patch that makes it work here, that increases
> > MAX_OFFSETS to 1420, adds a new entry to the end for the new APIs, but
> > really I think the current code is broken, and is happening to work
> > out, but I'm hoping I'm just missing something obvious and it'll be a
> > one line fix for Emil.
> >
> As you have noticed the old generator would add entries to the glapi
> table in arbitrary order.
> Meaning that the ABI between dri/glapi/libGL* would break every now and then.
>
> In more detail - libGL* would expect glFooBar at offset X, while the
> function is at Y according to glapi and the dri module sets the
> dispatch at Y. Latter uses a combination of fixed offset and dynamic
> offset lookup.
>
> Currently ES* is ported to the new generator and I have some patches
> for libGL and glapi, but no DRI modules just yet.
> A reasonable short term fix is to update the old generator to honour
> the full static_data table.
>
> I'll have a look at that and updating the libGL/libglapi patches.
>
Currently tweaking the most annoying bits - need to ensure the
function aliasing is correct (+ add some test) and go through the
massive diff.
Dave, anyone - do we have details (build options, test command
failing) about the CI breakage?
>From a quick look, I did not see anything related in
https://mesa-ci.01.org/mesa_master/builds/ and
https://mesa-ci.01.org/mesa_master_daily/builds/
Thanks
Emil
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list