[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/4] gallium: redefine ATOMINC_WRAP to be more hardware-friendly

Ilia Mirkin imirkin at alum.mit.edu
Wed Aug 7 03:06:13 UTC 2019


Both AMD and NVIDIA hardware define it this way. Instead of replicating
the logic everywhere, just fix it up in one place.

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
---

I'm open to also not doing this. Just seems like it'll make our
collective lives a little easier, since this is what the hw wants (and
presumably other APIs ... PTX definitely defines it this way).

If there's push-back, I can also duplicate the logic in codegen.

 src/gallium/docs/source/tgsi.rst                  |  2 +-
 src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_shader_tgsi_mem.c | 12 ------------
 src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp        | 11 ++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/gallium/docs/source/tgsi.rst b/src/gallium/docs/source/tgsi.rst
index 17ad097e85e..e72b047dbd5 100644
--- a/src/gallium/docs/source/tgsi.rst
+++ b/src/gallium/docs/source/tgsi.rst
@@ -2846,7 +2846,7 @@ These atomic operations may only be used with 32-bit integer image formats.
 
   dst_x = resource[offset] + 1
 
-  resource[offset] = dst_x < src_x ? dst_x : 0
+  resource[offset] = dst_x <= src_x ? dst_x : 0
 
 
 .. opcode:: ATOMDEC_WRAP - Atomic decrement + wrap around
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_shader_tgsi_mem.c b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_shader_tgsi_mem.c
index 4a4ba43780a..f79ed2c57e1 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_shader_tgsi_mem.c
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_shader_tgsi_mem.c
@@ -828,18 +828,6 @@ static void atomic_emit(
 	args.data[num_data++] =
 		ac_to_integer(&ctx->ac, lp_build_emit_fetch(bld_base, inst, 2, 0));
 
-	if (inst->Instruction.Opcode == TGSI_OPCODE_ATOMINC_WRAP) {
-		/* ATOMIC_INC instruction does:
-		 *      value = (value + 1) % (data + 1)
-		 * but we want:
-		 *      value = (value + 1) % data
-		 * So replace 'data' by 'data - 1'.
-		 */
-		args.data[0] = LLVMBuildSub(ctx->ac.builder,
-					    args.data[0],
-					    ctx->ac.i32_1, "");
-	}
-
 	args.cache_policy = get_cache_policy(ctx, inst, true, false, false);
 
 	if (inst->Src[0].Register.File == TGSI_FILE_BUFFER) {
diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
index ff2ec0726e8..9b982569490 100644
--- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
@@ -3938,9 +3938,18 @@ glsl_to_tgsi_visitor::visit_image_intrinsic(ir_call *ir)
       case ir_intrinsic_image_atomic_comp_swap:
          opcode = TGSI_OPCODE_ATOMCAS;
          break;
-      case ir_intrinsic_image_atomic_inc_wrap:
+      case ir_intrinsic_image_atomic_inc_wrap: {
+         /* There's a bit of disagreement between GLSL and the hardware. The
+          * hardware wants to wrap after the given wrap value, while GLSL
+          * wants to wrap at the value. Subtract 1 to make up the difference.
+          */
+         st_src_reg wrap = get_temp(glsl_type::uint_type);
+         emit_asm(ir, TGSI_OPCODE_ADD, st_dst_reg(wrap),
+                  arg1, st_src_reg_for_int(-1));
+         arg1 = wrap;
          opcode = TGSI_OPCODE_ATOMINC_WRAP;
          break;
+      }
       case ir_intrinsic_image_atomic_dec_wrap:
          opcode = TGSI_OPCODE_ATOMDEC_WRAP;
          break;
-- 
2.21.0



More information about the mesa-dev mailing list