[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] radv/gfx10: do not use the fast depth or stencil clear bytes path
Bas Nieuwenhuizen
bas at basnieuwenhuizen.nl
Mon Jul 29 12:30:10 UTC 2019
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 2:20 PM Samuel Pitoiset
<samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/29/19 2:15 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 2:11 PM Samuel Pitoiset
> > <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The HTILE masks seem to be different and so we need to rework that
> >> path. Just disabled for now and implement later.
> > The HTILE masks are not different per amdvlk?
> >
> > Can you at least rework the commit message to reflect that?
> "It needs to be reworked on GFX10, so just disable it for now." ?
How about just "It causes issues on GFX10"? We don't know it needs to
be reworked either?
> >> This fixes rendering issues with vkmark and Wreckfest at least.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_clear.c | 5 +++--
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_clear.c b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_clear.c
> >> index b93ba3e0b29..8ddc2e38cd4 100644
> >> --- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_clear.c
> >> +++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_meta_clear.c
> >> @@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ radv_can_fast_clear_depth(struct radv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer,
> >> if (!view_mask && clear_rect->layerCount != iview->image->info.array_size)
> >> return false;
> >>
> >> - if (cmd_buffer->device->physical_device->rad_info.chip_class < GFX9 &&
> >> + if (cmd_buffer->device->physical_device->rad_info.chip_class != GFX9 &&
> >> (!(aspects & VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_DEPTH_BIT) ||
> >> ((vk_format_aspects(iview->image->vk_format) & VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_STENCIL_BIT) &&
> >> !(aspects & VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_STENCIL_BIT))))
> >> @@ -1048,7 +1048,8 @@ radv_fast_clear_depth(struct radv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer,
> >> iview->image->planes[0].surface.htile_size, clear_word);
> >> } else {
> >> /* Only clear depth or stencil bytes in the HTILE buffer. */
> >> - assert(cmd_buffer->device->physical_device->rad_info.chip_class >= GFX9);
> >> + /* TODO: Implement that path for GFX10. */
> >> + assert(cmd_buffer->device->physical_device->rad_info.chip_class == GFX9);
> >> flush_bits = clear_htile_mask(cmd_buffer, iview->image->bo,
> >> iview->image->offset + iview->image->htile_offset,
> >> iview->image->planes[0].surface.htile_size, clear_word,
> >> --
> >> 2.22.0
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mesa-dev mailing list
> >> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list