[PATCH v2] drm/doc: add rfc section for small BAR uapi
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Wed Apr 27 15:04:52 UTC 2022
Am 27.04.22 um 17:02 schrieb Matthew Auld:
> On 27/04/2022 07:55, Christian König wrote:
>> Well usually we increment the drm minor version when adding some new
>> flags on amdgpu.
>>
>> Additional to that just one comment from our experience with that:
>> You don't just need one flag, but two. The first one is a hint which
>> says "CPU access needed" and the second is a promise which says "CPU
>> access never needed".
>>
>> The background is that on a whole bunch of buffers you can 100%
>> certain say that you will never ever need CPU access.
>>
>> Then at least we have a whole bunch of buffers where we might need
>> CPU access, but can't tell for sure.
>>
>> And last we have stuff like transfer buffers you can be 100% sure
>> that you need CPU access.
>>
>> Separating it like this helped a lot with performance on small BAR
>> systems.
>
> Thanks for the comments. For the "CPU access never needed" flag, what
> extra stuff does that do on the kernel side vs not specifying any
> flag/hint? I assume it still prioritizes using the non-CPU visible
> portion first? What else does it do?
It's used as a hint when you need to pin BOs for scanout for example.
In general we try to allocate BOs which are marked "CPU access needed"
in the CPU visible window if possible, but fallback to any memory if
that won't fit.
Christian.
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>> Am 27.04.22 um 08:48 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin:
>>> One question though, how do we detect that this flag
>>> (I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS) is accepted on a given
>>> kernel?
>>> I assume older kernels are going to reject object creation if we use
>>> this flag?
>>>
>>> I didn't plan to use __drm_i915_query_vma_info, but isn't it
>>> inconsistent to select the placement on the GEM object and then
>>> query whether it's mappable by address?
>>> You made a comment stating this is racy, wouldn't querying on the
>>> GEM object prevent this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Lionel
>>>
>>> On 27/04/2022 09:35, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
>>>> Hi Matt,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The proposal looks good to me.
>>>>
>>>> Looking forward to try it on drm-tip.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Lionel
>>>>
>>>> On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>>>> Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
>>>>>
>>>>> v2:
>>>>> - Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas)
>>>>> - Rework error capture interactions, including no longer needing
>>>>> NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS for objects marked for capture. (Thomas)
>>>>> - Add probed_cpu_visible_size. (Lionel)
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield at intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>>>>> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen at intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
>>>>> Cc: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin at intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h | 190
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst | 58 +++++++
>>>>> Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst | 4 +
>>>>> 3 files changed, 252 insertions(+)
>>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
>>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
>>>>> b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 000000000000..7bfd0cf44d35
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * struct __drm_i915_memory_region_info - Describes one region as
>>>>> known to the
>>>>> + * driver.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Note this is using both struct drm_i915_query_item and struct
>>>>> drm_i915_query.
>>>>> + * For this new query we are adding the new query id
>>>>> DRM_I915_QUERY_MEMORY_REGIONS
>>>>> + * at &drm_i915_query_item.query_id.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +struct __drm_i915_memory_region_info {
>>>>> + /** @region: The class:instance pair encoding */
>>>>> + struct drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance region;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /** @rsvd0: MBZ */
>>>>> + __u32 rsvd0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /** @probed_size: Memory probed by the driver (-1 = unknown) */
>>>>> + __u64 probed_size;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /** @unallocated_size: Estimate of memory remaining (-1 =
>>>>> unknown) */
>>>>> + __u64 unallocated_size;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + union {
>>>>> + /** @rsvd1: MBZ */
>>>>> + __u64 rsvd1[8];
>>>>> + struct {
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * @probed_cpu_visible_size: Memory probed by the driver
>>>>> + * that is CPU accessible. (-1 = unknown).
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This will be always be <= @probed_size, and the
>>>>> + * remainder(if there is any) will not be CPU
>>>>> + * accessible.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + __u64 probed_cpu_visible_size;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * struct __drm_i915_gem_create_ext - Existing gem_create
>>>>> behaviour, with added
>>>>> + * extension support using struct i915_user_extension.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Note that new buffer flags should be added here, at least for
>>>>> the stuff that
>>>>> + * is immutable. Previously we would have two ioctls, one to
>>>>> create the object
>>>>> + * with gem_create, and another to apply various parameters,
>>>>> however this
>>>>> + * creates some ambiguity for the params which are considered
>>>>> immutable. Also in
>>>>> + * general we're phasing out the various SET/GET ioctls.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +struct __drm_i915_gem_create_ext {
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * @size: Requested size for the object.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * The (page-aligned) allocated size for the object will be
>>>>> returned.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Note that for some devices we have might have further minimum
>>>>> + * page-size restrictions(larger than 4K), like for device
>>>>> local-memory.
>>>>> + * However in general the final size here should always
>>>>> reflect any
>>>>> + * rounding up, if for example using the
>>>>> I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS
>>>>> + * extension to place the object in device local-memory.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + __u64 size;
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * @handle: Returned handle for the object.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Object handles are nonzero.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + __u32 handle;
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * @flags: Optional flags.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Supported values:
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS - Signal to the
>>>>> kernel that
>>>>> + * the object will need to be accessed via the CPU.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Only valid when placing objects in
>>>>> I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, and
>>>>> + * only strictly required on platforms where only some of the
>>>>> device
>>>>> + * memory is directly visible or mappable through the CPU,
>>>>> like on DG2+.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * One of the placements MUST also be
>>>>> I915_MEMORY_CLASS_SYSTEM, to
>>>>> + * ensure we can always spill the allocation to system
>>>>> memory, if we
>>>>> + * can't place the object in the mappable part of
>>>>> + * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Note that since the kernel only supports flat-CCS on
>>>>> objects that can
>>>>> + * *only* be placed in I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, we therefore
>>>>> don't
>>>>> + * support I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS together
>>>>> with
>>>>> + * flat-CCS.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Without this hint, the kernel will assume that non-mappable
>>>>> + * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE is preferred for this object.
>>>>> Note that the
>>>>> + * kernel can still migrate the object to the mappable part,
>>>>> as a last
>>>>> + * resort, if userspace ever CPU faults this object, but this
>>>>> might be
>>>>> + * expensive, and so ideally should be avoided.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +#define I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS (1 << 0)
>>>>> + __u32 flags;
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * @extensions: The chain of extensions to apply to this object.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This will be useful in the future when we need to support
>>>>> several
>>>>> + * different extensions, and we need to apply more than one when
>>>>> + * creating the object. See struct i915_user_extension.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * If we don't supply any extensions then we get the same old
>>>>> gem_create
>>>>> + * behaviour.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * For I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS usage see
>>>>> + * struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * For I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_PROTECTED_CONTENT usage see
>>>>> + * struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext_protected_content.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +#define I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS 0
>>>>> +#define I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_PROTECTED_CONTENT 1
>>>>> + __u64 extensions;
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO 5
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * struct __drm_i915_query_vma_info
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Given a vm and GTT address, lookup the corresponding vma,
>>>>> returning its set
>>>>> + * of attributes.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * .. code-block:: C
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * struct drm_i915_query_vma_info info = {};
>>>>> + * struct drm_i915_query_item item = {
>>>>> + * .data_ptr = (uintptr_t)&info,
>>>>> + * .query_id = DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO,
>>>>> + * };
>>>>> + * struct drm_i915_query query = {
>>>>> + * .num_items = 1,
>>>>> + * .items_ptr = (uintptr_t)&item,
>>>>> + * };
>>>>> + * int err;
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * // Unlike some other types of queries, there is no need to
>>>>> first query
>>>>> + * // the size of the data_ptr blob here, since we already
>>>>> know ahead of
>>>>> + * // time how big this needs to be.
>>>>> + * item.length = sizeof(info);
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * // Next we fill in the vm_id and ppGTT address of the vma
>>>>> we wish
>>>>> + * // to query, before then firing off the query.
>>>>> + * info.vm_id = vm_id;
>>>>> + * info.offset = gtt_address;
>>>>> + * err = ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_QUERY, &query);
>>>>> + * if (err || item.length < 0) ...
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * // If all went well we can now inspect the returned
>>>>> attributes.
>>>>> + * if (info.attributes & DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO_CPU_VISIBLE) ...
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +struct __drm_i915_query_vma_info {
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * @vm_id: The given vm id that contains the vma. The id is
>>>>> the value
>>>>> + * returned by the DRM_I915_GEM_VM_CREATE. See struct
>>>>> + * drm_i915_gem_vm_control.vm_id.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + __u32 vm_id;
>>>>> + /** @pad: MBZ. */
>>>>> + __u32 pad;
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * @offset: The corresponding ppGTT address of the vma which
>>>>> the kernel
>>>>> + * will use to perform the lookup.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + __u64 offset;
>>>>> + /**
>>>>> + * @attributes: The returned attributes for the given vma.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Possible values:
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO_CPU_VISIBLE - Set if the pages
>>>>> backing the
>>>>> + * vma are currently CPU accessible. If this is not set then
>>>>> the vma is
>>>>> + * currently backed by I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE memory, which
>>>>> the CPU
>>>>> + * cannot directly access(this is only possible on discrete
>>>>> devices with
>>>>> + * a small BAR). Attempting to MMAP and fault such an object
>>>>> will
>>>>> + * require the kernel first synchronising any GPU work tied
>>>>> to the
>>>>> + * object, before then migrating the pages, either to the CPU
>>>>> accessible
>>>>> + * part of I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, or
>>>>> I915_MEMORY_CLASS_SYSTEM, if the
>>>>> + * placements permit it. See
>>>>> I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Note that this is inherently racy.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +#define DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO_CPU_VISIBLE (1<<0)
>>>>> + __u64 attributes;
>>>>> + /** @rsvd: MBZ */
>>>>> + __u32 rsvd[4];
>>>>> +};
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst
>>>>> b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 000000000000..be3d9bcdd86d
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
>>>>> +==========================
>>>>> +I915 Small BAR RFC Section
>>>>> +==========================
>>>>> +Starting from DG2 we will have resizable BAR support for device
>>>>> local-memory(i.e
>>>>> +I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE), but in some cases the final BAR size
>>>>> might still be
>>>>> +smaller than the total probed_size. In such cases, only some
>>>>> subset of
>>>>> +I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE will be CPU accessible(for example the
>>>>> first 256M),
>>>>> +while the remainder is only accessible via the GPU.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS flag
>>>>> +----------------------------------------------
>>>>> +New gem_create_ext flag to tell the kernel that a BO will require
>>>>> CPU access.
>>>>> +This becomes important when placing an object in
>>>>> I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, where
>>>>> +underneath the device has a small BAR, meaning only some portion
>>>>> of it is CPU
>>>>> +accessible. Without this flag the kernel will assume that CPU
>>>>> access is not
>>>>> +required, and prioritize using the non-CPU visible portion of
>>>>> +I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +.. kernel-doc:: Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
>>>>> + :functions: __drm_i915_gem_create_ext
>>>>> +
>>>>> +probed_cpu_visible_size attribute
>>>>> +---------------------------------
>>>>> +New struct__drm_i915_memory_region attribute which returns the
>>>>> total size of the
>>>>> +CPU accessible portion, for the particular region. This should
>>>>> only be
>>>>> +applicable for I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Vulkan will need this as part of creating a separate VkMemoryHeap
>>>>> with the
>>>>> +VK_MEMORY_PROPERTY_HOST_VISIBLE_BIT set, to represent the CPU
>>>>> visible portion,
>>>>> +where the total size of the heap needs to be known.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +.. kernel-doc:: Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
>>>>> + :functions: __drm_i915_memory_region_info
>>>>> +
>>>>> +DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO query
>>>>> +-----------------------------
>>>>> +Query the attributes of some vma. Given a vm and GTT offset, find
>>>>> the
>>>>> +respective vma, and return its set of attributes. For now we only
>>>>> support
>>>>> +DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO_CPU_VISIBLE, which is set if the
>>>>> object/vma is
>>>>> +currently placed in memory that is accessible by the CPU. This
>>>>> should always be
>>>>> +set on devices where the CPU probed_cpu_visible_size of
>>>>> I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE
>>>>> +matches the probed_size. If this is not set then CPU faulting the
>>>>> object will
>>>>> +likely first require migrating the pages.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +.. kernel-doc:: Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
>>>>> + :functions: __drm_i915_query_vma_info
>>>>> +
>>>>> +Error Capture restrictions
>>>>> +--------------------------
>>>>> +With error capture we have two new restrictions:
>>>>> +
>>>>> + 1) Error capture is best effort on small BAR systems; if the
>>>>> pages are not
>>>>> + CPU accessible, at the time of capture, then the kernel is
>>>>> free to skip
>>>>> + trying to capture them.
>>>>> +
>>>>> + 2) On discrete we now reject error capture on recoverable
>>>>> contexts. In the
>>>>> + future the kernel may want to blit during error capture, when
>>>>> for example
>>>>> + something is not currently CPU accessible.
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
>>>>> b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
>>>>> index 91e93a705230..5a3bd3924ba6 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
>>>>> @@ -23,3 +23,7 @@ host such documentation:
>>>>> .. toctree::
>>>>> i915_scheduler.rst
>>>>> +
>>>>> +.. toctree::
>>>>> +
>>>>> + i915_small_bar.rst
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list