[PATCH v2] drm/doc: add rfc section for small BAR uapi
Lionel Landwerlin
lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com
Mon May 2 07:54:40 UTC 2022
On 20/04/2022 20:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+.
>
> v2:
> - Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas)
> - Rework error capture interactions, including no longer needing
> NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS for objects marked for capture. (Thomas)
> - Add probed_cpu_visible_size. (Lionel)
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
> Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield at intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen at intel.com>
> Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
> Cc: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin at intel.com>
> Cc: mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> ---
> Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst | 58 +++++++
> Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst | 4 +
> 3 files changed, 252 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
> create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7bfd0cf44d35
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
> +/**
> + * struct __drm_i915_memory_region_info - Describes one region as known to the
> + * driver.
> + *
> + * Note this is using both struct drm_i915_query_item and struct drm_i915_query.
> + * For this new query we are adding the new query id DRM_I915_QUERY_MEMORY_REGIONS
> + * at &drm_i915_query_item.query_id.
> + */
> +struct __drm_i915_memory_region_info {
> + /** @region: The class:instance pair encoding */
> + struct drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance region;
> +
> + /** @rsvd0: MBZ */
> + __u32 rsvd0;
> +
> + /** @probed_size: Memory probed by the driver (-1 = unknown) */
> + __u64 probed_size;
> +
> + /** @unallocated_size: Estimate of memory remaining (-1 = unknown) */
> + __u64 unallocated_size;
> +
> + union {
> + /** @rsvd1: MBZ */
> + __u64 rsvd1[8];
> + struct {
> + /**
> + * @probed_cpu_visible_size: Memory probed by the driver
> + * that is CPU accessible. (-1 = unknown).
> + *
> + * This will be always be <= @probed_size, and the
> + * remainder(if there is any) will not be CPU
> + * accessible.
> + */
> + __u64 probed_cpu_visible_size;
> + };
Trying to implement userspace support in Vulkan for this, I have an
additional question about the value of probed_cpu_visible_size.
When is it set to -1?
I'm guessing before there is support for this value it'll be 0 (MBZ).
After after it should either be the entire lmem or something smaller.
-Lionel
> + };
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct __drm_i915_gem_create_ext - Existing gem_create behaviour, with added
> + * extension support using struct i915_user_extension.
> + *
> + * Note that new buffer flags should be added here, at least for the stuff that
> + * is immutable. Previously we would have two ioctls, one to create the object
> + * with gem_create, and another to apply various parameters, however this
> + * creates some ambiguity for the params which are considered immutable. Also in
> + * general we're phasing out the various SET/GET ioctls.
> + */
> +struct __drm_i915_gem_create_ext {
> + /**
> + * @size: Requested size for the object.
> + *
> + * The (page-aligned) allocated size for the object will be returned.
> + *
> + * Note that for some devices we have might have further minimum
> + * page-size restrictions(larger than 4K), like for device local-memory.
> + * However in general the final size here should always reflect any
> + * rounding up, if for example using the I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS
> + * extension to place the object in device local-memory.
> + */
> + __u64 size;
> + /**
> + * @handle: Returned handle for the object.
> + *
> + * Object handles are nonzero.
> + */
> + __u32 handle;
> + /**
> + * @flags: Optional flags.
> + *
> + * Supported values:
> + *
> + * I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS - Signal to the kernel that
> + * the object will need to be accessed via the CPU.
> + *
> + * Only valid when placing objects in I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, and
> + * only strictly required on platforms where only some of the device
> + * memory is directly visible or mappable through the CPU, like on DG2+.
> + *
> + * One of the placements MUST also be I915_MEMORY_CLASS_SYSTEM, to
> + * ensure we can always spill the allocation to system memory, if we
> + * can't place the object in the mappable part of
> + * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE.
> + *
> + * Note that since the kernel only supports flat-CCS on objects that can
> + * *only* be placed in I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, we therefore don't
> + * support I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS together with
> + * flat-CCS.
> + *
> + * Without this hint, the kernel will assume that non-mappable
> + * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE is preferred for this object. Note that the
> + * kernel can still migrate the object to the mappable part, as a last
> + * resort, if userspace ever CPU faults this object, but this might be
> + * expensive, and so ideally should be avoided.
> + */
> +#define I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS (1 << 0)
> + __u32 flags;
> + /**
> + * @extensions: The chain of extensions to apply to this object.
> + *
> + * This will be useful in the future when we need to support several
> + * different extensions, and we need to apply more than one when
> + * creating the object. See struct i915_user_extension.
> + *
> + * If we don't supply any extensions then we get the same old gem_create
> + * behaviour.
> + *
> + * For I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS usage see
> + * struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions.
> + *
> + * For I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_PROTECTED_CONTENT usage see
> + * struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext_protected_content.
> + */
> +#define I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS 0
> +#define I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_PROTECTED_CONTENT 1
> + __u64 extensions;
> +};
> +
> +#define DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO 5
> +
> +/**
> + * struct __drm_i915_query_vma_info
> + *
> + * Given a vm and GTT address, lookup the corresponding vma, returning its set
> + * of attributes.
> + *
> + * .. code-block:: C
> + *
> + * struct drm_i915_query_vma_info info = {};
> + * struct drm_i915_query_item item = {
> + * .data_ptr = (uintptr_t)&info,
> + * .query_id = DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO,
> + * };
> + * struct drm_i915_query query = {
> + * .num_items = 1,
> + * .items_ptr = (uintptr_t)&item,
> + * };
> + * int err;
> + *
> + * // Unlike some other types of queries, there is no need to first query
> + * // the size of the data_ptr blob here, since we already know ahead of
> + * // time how big this needs to be.
> + * item.length = sizeof(info);
> + *
> + * // Next we fill in the vm_id and ppGTT address of the vma we wish
> + * // to query, before then firing off the query.
> + * info.vm_id = vm_id;
> + * info.offset = gtt_address;
> + * err = ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_QUERY, &query);
> + * if (err || item.length < 0) ...
> + *
> + * // If all went well we can now inspect the returned attributes.
> + * if (info.attributes & DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO_CPU_VISIBLE) ...
> + */
> +struct __drm_i915_query_vma_info {
> + /**
> + * @vm_id: The given vm id that contains the vma. The id is the value
> + * returned by the DRM_I915_GEM_VM_CREATE. See struct
> + * drm_i915_gem_vm_control.vm_id.
> + */
> + __u32 vm_id;
> + /** @pad: MBZ. */
> + __u32 pad;
> + /**
> + * @offset: The corresponding ppGTT address of the vma which the kernel
> + * will use to perform the lookup.
> + */
> + __u64 offset;
> + /**
> + * @attributes: The returned attributes for the given vma.
> + *
> + * Possible values:
> + *
> + * DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO_CPU_VISIBLE - Set if the pages backing the
> + * vma are currently CPU accessible. If this is not set then the vma is
> + * currently backed by I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE memory, which the CPU
> + * cannot directly access(this is only possible on discrete devices with
> + * a small BAR). Attempting to MMAP and fault such an object will
> + * require the kernel first synchronising any GPU work tied to the
> + * object, before then migrating the pages, either to the CPU accessible
> + * part of I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, or I915_MEMORY_CLASS_SYSTEM, if the
> + * placements permit it. See I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS.
> + *
> + * Note that this is inherently racy.
> + */
> +#define DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO_CPU_VISIBLE (1<<0)
> + __u64 attributes;
> + /** @rsvd: MBZ */
> + __u32 rsvd[4];
> +};
> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..be3d9bcdd86d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> +==========================
> +I915 Small BAR RFC Section
> +==========================
> +Starting from DG2 we will have resizable BAR support for device local-memory(i.e
> +I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE), but in some cases the final BAR size might still be
> +smaller than the total probed_size. In such cases, only some subset of
> +I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE will be CPU accessible(for example the first 256M),
> +while the remainder is only accessible via the GPU.
> +
> +I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS flag
> +----------------------------------------------
> +New gem_create_ext flag to tell the kernel that a BO will require CPU access.
> +This becomes important when placing an object in I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, where
> +underneath the device has a small BAR, meaning only some portion of it is CPU
> +accessible. Without this flag the kernel will assume that CPU access is not
> +required, and prioritize using the non-CPU visible portion of
> +I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE.
> +
> +.. kernel-doc:: Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
> + :functions: __drm_i915_gem_create_ext
> +
> +probed_cpu_visible_size attribute
> +---------------------------------
> +New struct__drm_i915_memory_region attribute which returns the total size of the
> +CPU accessible portion, for the particular region. This should only be
> +applicable for I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE.
> +
> +Vulkan will need this as part of creating a separate VkMemoryHeap with the
> +VK_MEMORY_PROPERTY_HOST_VISIBLE_BIT set, to represent the CPU visible portion,
> +where the total size of the heap needs to be known.
> +
> +.. kernel-doc:: Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
> + :functions: __drm_i915_memory_region_info
> +
> +DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO query
> +-----------------------------
> +Query the attributes of some vma. Given a vm and GTT offset, find the
> +respective vma, and return its set of attributes. For now we only support
> +DRM_I915_QUERY_VMA_INFO_CPU_VISIBLE, which is set if the object/vma is
> +currently placed in memory that is accessible by the CPU. This should always be
> +set on devices where the CPU probed_cpu_visible_size of I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE
> +matches the probed_size. If this is not set then CPU faulting the object will
> +likely first require migrating the pages.
> +
> +.. kernel-doc:: Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h
> + :functions: __drm_i915_query_vma_info
> +
> +Error Capture restrictions
> +--------------------------
> +With error capture we have two new restrictions:
> +
> + 1) Error capture is best effort on small BAR systems; if the pages are not
> + CPU accessible, at the time of capture, then the kernel is free to skip
> + trying to capture them.
> +
> + 2) On discrete we now reject error capture on recoverable contexts. In the
> + future the kernel may want to blit during error capture, when for example
> + something is not currently CPU accessible.
> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
> index 91e93a705230..5a3bd3924ba6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst
> @@ -23,3 +23,7 @@ host such documentation:
> .. toctree::
>
> i915_scheduler.rst
> +
> +.. toctree::
> +
> + i915_small_bar.rst
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list