Does gbm_bo_map() implicitly synchronise?
Michel Dänzer
michel.daenzer at mailbox.org
Mon Jun 17 14:50:37 UTC 2024
On 2024-06-17 12:29, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>
> Just to avoid any uncertainty, are both of these things done implicitly by gbm_bo_map()/gbm_bo_unmap()?
>
> I did test adding those steps just in case, but unfortunately did not see an improvement. My order was:
>
> 1. gbm_bo_import(GBM_BO_USE_RENDERING)
> 2. gbm_bo_get_fd()
> 3. Wait for client to request displaying the buffer
> 4. gbm_bo_map(GBM_BO_TRANSFER_READ)
> 5. select(fd+1, &fds, NULL, NULL, NULL)
*If* select() is needed, it needs to be before gbm_bo_map(), because the latter may perform a blit from the real BO to a staging one for CPU access.
> 6. ioctl(DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC, &{ .flags = DMA_BUF_SYNC_START | DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ })
gbm_bo_map() should do this internally if needed.
> 7. pixman_blt()
> 8. gbm_bo_unmap()
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and Xwayland developer
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list