<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Uninitialized variables leads to random segfaults (valgrind log, apitrace attached)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94955#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Uninitialized variables leads to random segfaults (valgrind log, apitrace attached)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94955">bug 94955</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:sroland@vmware.com" title="Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>"> Roland Scheidegger</a> <pre>(In reply to David Lonie from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94955#c7">comment #7</a>) > > <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94955#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Uninitialized variables leads to random segfaults (valgrind log, apitrace attached)" href="show_bug.cgi?id=94955">bug 94955</a> from Roland Scheidegger > > FWIW the trace has some issues, namely it requests a 4.5 context thus needs > > overrides to run. Not sure if this actually causes problems. > > The 4.5 override was needed for my apitrace replay context. The actual > segfaults are happening on a machine using a different (I believe 3.2?) > context. > > Is there information around that details how to get a better apitrace for > you folks? I have another segfaulting test I could capture for you. > The problem is, if the trace requires version override, it is difficult to tell if it actually isn't using any functions which are actually known to not really work.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>