<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - mesa-12.0.1 with llvm-3.9.0_rc3 - src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/llvm/invocation.cpp:212:75: error: no matching function for call to clang::CompilerInvocation::setLangDefaults"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97542#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - mesa-12.0.1 with llvm-3.9.0_rc3 - src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/llvm/invocation.cpp:212:75: error: no matching function for call to clang::CompilerInvocation::setLangDefaults"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97542">bug 97542</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:michel@daenzer.net" title="Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>"> <span class="fn">Michel Dänzer</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Vedran Miletić from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=97542#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> We could do that once LLVM 3.9 is out. Michel, thoughts?</span >
It would require backporting all changes from master which are needed for LLVM
3.9. If any of them are missed, there might be subtle issues.
Personally, I think it's not worth bothering. The next major Mesa release
shouldn't be too far away, and distros tend to take a while to build Mesa
against new LLVM releases anyway.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>