<html><head></head><body><div>On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 19:17 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><p dir="ltr"></p>
<p dir="ltr">On Sep 29, 2016 5:14 PM, "Timothy Arceri" <<a href="mailto:timothy.arceri@collabora.com">timothy.arceri@collabora.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 15:56 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:<br>
> > On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák <<a href="mailto:maraeo@gmail.com">maraeo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Hi,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > It's been almost 4 months since the 12.0 branch was created, and<br>
> > > soon<br>
> > > it will have been 3 months since Mesa 12.0 was released.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Is there any reason we haven't created the stable branch yet?<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Ideally, we would time the release so that it's 1-2 months before<br>
> > > fall<br>
> > > distribution releases.<br>
> > ><br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks Marek !<br>
> ><br>
> > In all honesty I was secretly hoping that we'll get Dave/Bas RADV for<br>
> > 12.1.<br>
><br>
> I believe the release should be 13?? Core Mesa and the Intel driver<br>
> have reached 4.4 this release also core Mesa is now at 4.5 despite not<br>
> being enabled anywhere.</p>
<p dir="ltr">My personal preference, for whatever it's worth, would be to call it 12.1. The 12.0 release was the biggest release we've had in a long time and it seems odd to me to jump to 13.0 right away when we really haven't done much at all in terms of new features. (I think it's only 2 or 3 desktop features in the case of Intel. A bit more on the ES side I guess).</p></blockquote><div><br></div><div>My understanding is the major version has only ever been bumped when full support for a new desktop OpenGL version has been reached regardless of the number of extensions enabled. We did the same thing going from 8.0 > 9.0 were as the 7 release went all the way to 7.11 over a 4 year period. It seems odd to change the way we bump versions at this point in time, although in future maybe it will need to be based on Vulkin versions also.</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">> > With the topic of which would be 'the default' Vulkan driver for<br>
> > ATI/AMD hardware to be considered at a later stage.<br>
> ><br>
> > That said here are the tentative dates:<br>
> ><br>
> > Oct 7/14 2016 - Feature freeze/Release candidate 1<br>
> > Oct 14/21 2016 - Release candidate 2<br>
> > Oct 21/28 2016 - Release candidate 3/final release<br>
> ><br>
> > Fwiw I'm still in favour of getting RADV in even if it's not<br>
> > perfect/feature complete. Devs, let me know if there's a "must have"<br>
> > feature that we want in 12.1.<br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks<br>
> > Emil<br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > mesa-dev mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org">mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br>
> > <a href="https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev">https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> mesa-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org">mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev">https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev</a><br></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
<a href="mailto:mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org">mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev">https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev</a>
</pre></blockquote></body></html>