<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - glsl: ralloc assertion "info->canary == CANARY" failed" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98595#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - glsl: ralloc assertion "info->canary == CANARY" failed" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98595">bug 98595</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:t_arceri@yahoo.com.au" title="Timothy Arceri <t_arceri@yahoo.com.au>"> Timothy Arceri</a> <pre>(In reply to Jonathan Gray from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=98595#c5">comment #5</a>) > Indeed the abort is not triggered with gcc 4.9 but is with gcc 4.2.1. > > For gcc < 4.4.3 and for clang HAS_TRIVIAL_DESTRUCTOR is set to > __has_trivial_destructor(T) otherwise it is (false). > > Everything worked last weeked, though that was before > cc6aa1d161280f10ded7834d1ec2413bc97589fe. Did you bisect to that commit? Besides me jumping the gun (sorry about that) and marking this a duplicate of a bug caused by that change it doesn't look like it should have anything to do with this bug. More likely to do will the linear allocator changes that landed 6 days ago. e.g 23e373eb4f9ca374313306701890642c30e8877e</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>