<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Shader Disk Cache 32/64 bit detection has a flaw. Missed existence of x32 ABI" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100073#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Shader Disk Cache 32/64 bit detection has a flaw. Missed existence of x32 ABI" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100073">bug 100073</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:bugspam@moreofthesa.me.uk" title="Darren Salt <bugspam@moreofthesa.me.uk>"> Darren Salt</a> <pre>This code is intended to be generic; it SHOULD work for other pairs such as armel and aarch64 (though breakage will happen should you have more than one 32-bit ARM ABI in use on one system). As such, as it's written, it should not be testing __i386__, __x86_64__ or similar macros, but it does need to test __ILP32__. (Aside: x32 code is 64-bit.) Without optimisation, yes, the testing is effectively at run-time; however, the values are constant. So in that sense, it's a small amount of bloat and unreachable code. FWIW, my implementation (which uses the ABI name from the architecture triplet) is here: <a href="https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/141891/">https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/141891/</a></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>