<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Shader Disk Cache 32/64 bit detection has a flaw. Missed existence of x32 ABI" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100073#c28">Comment # 28</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Shader Disk Cache 32/64 bit detection has a flaw. Missed existence of x32 ABI" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100073">bug 100073</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:emil.l.velikov@gmail.com" title="Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>"> Emil Velikov</a> <pre>Peter Dolding [seems like you like posting huge emails everywhere], attempting to summarise: Debian's interpretation of "reproducible" is - _all_ the binaries across _any_ arch _must_ have the same build timestamp. Yet the documentation does not even remotely say so, even if [Debian people] they wrote it the first place. Do I understand this correctly when I say that as you run the arm64 binary that will be used alongside arm64 Mesa - correct ? If so how can one use the arm64 build radeonsi alongside the x86 kernel amdgpu/radeon driver - kindly point us to a reading material. As a parting gift - being an open-source project does not mean that people can or should accommodate of all the setups out there. Not my call, but personally I'll put this in the WONTFIX pile.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>