<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;" dir="ltr">
<p>Hello Emil,</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I'm not sure if you have read the full conversation, but I changed my mind about this.</p>
<p>I have shifted focus to use Sphinx for website generation along with documentation. </p>
<p>As far as I can tell, there is already documentation about NIR and Gallium writen in ReStructured Text, which Sphinx can use.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>The last two week I'm very busy at work, so I haven't made much progress on the website itself.</p>
<p>My hope is to release a new repository on github this weekend, with the initial website in a ReStructured Text format.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Jean Hertel.<br>
</p>
<br>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<div>
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt" face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>De:</b> Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com><br>
<b>Enviado:</b> quarta-feira, 29 de março de 2017 12:32<br>
<b>Para:</b> Brian Paul<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Jean Hertel; mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org<br>
<b>Assunto:</b> Re: [Mesa-dev] [Request for Comments] - Port documentation to Markdown</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Hi Jean,<br>
<br>
On 8 March 2017 at 16:12, Brian Paul <brianp@vmware.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
>> >One thing that I would prefer so not see if heavy things like<br>
>> Bootstrap.<br>
>> >We definitely don't need it, I think writing our own few lines of CSS<br>
>> >(which can be inspired by anything you want) is better. We have more<br>
>> >than enough people who know how to do it (myself included), it will<br>
>> be<br>
>> >cleaner (we won't need to include the whole forest to get our tree)<br>
>> and<br>
>> >much easier to fix when there's a bug.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> I would tend to agree but I don't care too much about those details so<br>
>> long as it's maintainable. My primary concern is that while a lot of<br>
>> random developers in the community are liable to have brushed into CSS a<br>
>> time or two, most probably won't know bootstrap.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Yeah, I can's stress that too much. The site has to be easily maintainable<br>
> by the developers. I, for one, don't know much about websites beyond html<br>
> and a little CSS. If you create a new website infrastructure and then<br>
> disappear after a few months we need to be able to take over. Also, we<br>
> can't funnel documentation updates through a handful of people that know a<br>
> complex system.<br>
><br>
Have you had some time to look into this ?<br>
<br>
It would be great if we can get things rolling, even if not perfect.<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
Emil<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>