<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - mesa fails to check for gcc atomic primitives before using them"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93089#c17">Comment # 17</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - mesa fails to check for gcc atomic primitives before using them"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93089">bug 93089</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mattst88@gmail.com" title="Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Matt Turner</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Grazvydas Ignotas from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93089#c14">comment #14</a>)
<span class="quote">> Yes but any affected platforms we actually care about?
>
> Newer gcc should cover some of the cases mentioned in this bug. I think
> pre-v6 ARM now has 32bit atomics on Linux thanks to a kernel helper.
> Others you mentioned are hppa and superh, is anyone actually building mesa
> for those?
>
> Otherwise it will just be wasted effort for some dead code that nobody ever
> uses.</span >
Gentoo supports both hppa and sh. I find it doubtful that anyone would use Mesa
on sh, but hppa is well maintained. I should have a system running in a few
days on which I can test.
You figured out the solution -- I'm happy to copy-and-paste your small amount
of code to support hppa.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>