<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mattst88@gmail.com" title="Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Matt Turner</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - mesa fails to check for gcc atomic primitives before using them"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93089">bug 93089</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
<td>REOPENED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>WONTFIX
</td>
<td>---
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - mesa fails to check for gcc atomic primitives before using them"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93089#c20">Comment # 20</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - mesa fails to check for gcc atomic primitives before using them"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93089">bug 93089</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mattst88@gmail.com" title="Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Matt Turner</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Jonathan Gray from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93089#c18">comment #18</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Matt Turner from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93089#c16">comment #16</a>)
> > (In reply to Jonathan Gray from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93089#c15">comment #15</a>)
> > > Shocking as it may seem Mesa runs on more than just Linux.
> >
> > Don't act like that. Grazvydas wrote code to fix a bug you reported more
> > than two years ago. You should be thankful, not sarcastic.
> >
> > Presumably if you don't piss him off he'd be amenable to fixing other things
> > in this area.
>
> The problem was clearly stated in the original report. The changes that
> went in have not addressed this. Only a variant that concerns a subset.
> Closing the bug because it fixed the case he cared about and not the actual
> reported problem isn't helping anyone.
>
> I've had to workaround the breakage for years to be able to ship builds of
> Mesa on multiple architectures.</span >
I think you're inappropriately attributing malice to comments 12 and 14.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>