<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [llvmpipe] piglit gl-3.2-layered-rendering-framebuffertexture regression" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102123#c1">Comment # 1</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [llvmpipe] piglit gl-3.2-layered-rendering-framebuffertexture regression" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102123">bug 102123</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:sroland@vmware.com" title="Roland Scheidegger <sroland@vmware.com>"> Roland Scheidegger</a> <pre>If that's only softpipe/llvmpipe regressing, it is most likely due to only having fake msaa support. I'm a bit surprised the test result changed, but I suppose the test previously actually used a msaa texture with just 1 sample, which now gets upgraded automatically to 2 samples. Albeit I can't quite tell why this particular result changed, since mostly the nr_samples in the resource should be ignored. In any case, we don't handle msaa correctly, so one or two more tests failing in that area (<a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [softpipe] piglit arb_texture_view-targets regression" href="show_bug.cgi?id=102125">bug 102125</a> is really more of the same) isn't much of an issue (albeit it's too bad we can't stop (most of) the tests trying even though we report a maximum number of 0 samples). If hw drivers fail too that would be definitely worrying.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>