<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - [Regression] mpv, high rendering times (two to three times higher)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102597#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - [Regression] mpv, high rendering times (two to three times higher)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102597">bug 102597</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:bugs.freedesktop@haasn.xyz" title="Niklas Haas <bugs.freedesktop@haasn.xyz>"> <span class="fn">Niklas Haas</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre><span class="quote">> Thousands of mpv users rely on mesa's now incorrect behaviour to diagnose performance issues.</span >
Well, to be fair, that's going to end up being misleading one way or the other
- the timers are unreliable on so many platforms and configurations that using
them as the basis of a performance evaluation needs to be taken with a heavy
grain of salt. I also think these timers are only really relevant to developers
anyway; for users the only thing that really matters is whether or not it drops
frames (which mpv already displays separately).
<span class="quote">> Are you going to revert that commit in accordance with the spec or are you going to be stubborn and continue to violate it?</span >
I don't think pestering the developers is going to help this issue progress; if
anything, it will accomplish the opposite.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>