<div dir="ltr">Did you mean to remove the blacklist you added in the previous patch?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 at 01:03 Marek Olšák <<a href="mailto:maraeo@gmail.com">maraeo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">From: Marek Olšák <<a href="mailto:marek.olsak@amd.com" target="_blank">marek.olsak@amd.com</a>><br>
<br>
Since 2.4.90 might not work, just ask for the next version.<br>
---<br>
 <a href="http://configure.ac" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">configure.ac</a> | 9 +--------<br>
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)<br>
<br>
diff --git a/<a href="http://configure.ac" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">configure.ac</a> b/<a href="http://configure.ac" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">configure.ac</a><br>
index e29ce68..8ec5b26 100644<br>
--- a/<a href="http://configure.ac" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">configure.ac</a><br>
+++ b/<a href="http://configure.ac" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">configure.ac</a><br>
@@ -67,21 +67,21 @@ OPENCL_VERSION=1<br>
 AC_SUBST([OPENCL_VERSION])<br>
<br>
 # The idea is that libdrm is distributed as one cohesive package, even<br>
 # though it is composed of multiple libraries. However some drivers<br>
 # may have different version requirements than others. This list<br>
 # codifies which drivers need which version of libdrm. Any libdrm<br>
 # version dependencies in non-driver-specific code should be reflected<br>
 # in the first entry.<br>
 LIBDRM_REQUIRED=2.4.75<br>
 LIBDRM_RADEON_REQUIRED=2.4.71<br>
-LIBDRM_AMDGPU_REQUIRED=2.4.90<br>
+LIBDRM_AMDGPU_REQUIRED=2.4.91<br>
 LIBDRM_INTEL_REQUIRED=2.4.75<br>
 LIBDRM_NVVIEUX_REQUIRED=2.4.66<br>
 LIBDRM_NOUVEAU_REQUIRED=2.4.66<br>
 LIBDRM_FREEDRENO_REQUIRED=2.4.91<br>
 LIBDRM_ETNAVIV_REQUIRED=2.4.82<br>
<br>
 dnl Versions for external dependencies<br>
 DRI2PROTO_REQUIRED=2.8<br>
 GLPROTO_REQUIRED=1.4.14<br>
 LIBOMXIL_BELLAGIO_REQUIRED=0.0<br>
@@ -2601,27 +2601,20 @@ if test -n "$with_gallium_drivers"; then<br>
                 radeon_llvm_check $LLVM_REQUIRED_R600 "r600"<br>
<br>
                 llvm_add_component "asmparser" "r600"<br>
                 llvm_add_component "bitreader" "r600"<br>
             fi<br>
             ;;<br>
         xradeonsi)<br>
             HAVE_GALLIUM_RADEONSI=yes<br>
             PKG_CHECK_MODULES([RADEON], [libdrm >= $LIBDRM_RADEON_REQUIRED libdrm_radeon >= $LIBDRM_RADEON_REQUIRED])<br>
             PKG_CHECK_MODULES([AMDGPU], [libdrm >= $LIBDRM_AMDGPU_REQUIRED libdrm_amdgpu >= $LIBDRM_AMDGPU_REQUIRED])<br>
-<br>
-            # Blacklist libdrm_amdgpu 2.4.90 because it breaks older radeonsi<br>
-            libdrm_version=`pkg-config libdrm_amdgpu --modversion`<br>
-            if test "x$libdrm_version" = x2.4.90; then<br>
-                AC_MSG_ERROR([radeonsi can't use libdrm 2.4.90 due to a compatibility issue. Use a newer or older version.])<br>
-            fi<br>
-<br>
             require_libdrm "radeonsi"<br>
             radeon_llvm_check $LLVM_REQUIRED_RADEONSI "radeonsi"<br>
             if test "x$enable_egl" = xyes; then<br>
                 require_basic_egl "radeonsi"<br>
             fi<br>
             ;;<br>
         xnouveau)<br>
             HAVE_GALLIUM_NOUVEAU=yes<br>
             PKG_CHECK_MODULES([NOUVEAU], [libdrm >= $LIBDRM_NOUVEAU_REQUIRED libdrm_nouveau >= $LIBDRM_NOUVEAU_REQUIRED])<br>
             require_libdrm "nouveau"<br>
--<br>
2.7.4<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mesa-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" target="_blank">mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>