<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171#c17">Comment # 17</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171">bug 105171</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de" title="Dieter Nützel <Dieter@nuetzel-hh.de>"> <span class="fn">Dieter Nützel</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Clemens Eisserer from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=105171#c16">comment #16</a>)
<span class="quote">> some here, on my Kaveri 7650k results with the patch are basically unchanged
> :
>
> amdgpu:
> 8557.942992 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32
>
> should I test with radeon too?
>
> Dieter: Just to be curious, which values do you obtain with your polaris GPU?</span >
RX580 (DC enabled) 'cpupower frequency-set -g performance'
composit (faster): !!! ;-)
./JXRenderMark-1.0.1 3 32 3 32 3 32 3 32 3 32 3 32
29845.626072 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32
30745.957643 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32
30922.973502 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32
30460.302141 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32
30330.232018 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32
30757.257217 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32
without (slower):
28507.546115 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32
29570.588821 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32
29909.051450 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32
29839.934108 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32
30024.853684 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32
29852.673826 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>