<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - [GLSL] Unused arrays declared without a size should be handled like arrays of size 1."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106915#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - [GLSL] Unused arrays declared without a size should be handled like arrays of size 1."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106915">bug 106915</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jason@jlekstrand.net" title="Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>"> <span class="fn">Jason Ekstrand</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I really hate it, but I fear they may be allowed. From the GLSL 4.60 spec in
the section on UBO and SSBO layouts:
<span class="quote">> The shared qualifier overrides only the std140, std430, and packed
> qualifiers; other qualifiers are inherited. The compiler/linker will
> ensure that multiple programs and programmable stages containing this
> definition will share the same memory layout for this block, as long
> as all arrays are declared with explicit sizes and all matrices have
> matching row_major and/or column_major qualifications (which may come
> from a declaration outside the block definition).</span >
I really wish I hadn't found this text and I think it's silly but there it is.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>