<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [GLSL] Unused arrays declared without a size should be handled like arrays of size 1." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106915#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [GLSL] Unused arrays declared without a size should be handled like arrays of size 1." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106915">bug 106915</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:idr@freedesktop.org" title="Ian Romanick <idr@freedesktop.org>"> Ian Romanick</a> <pre>(In reply to Jason Ekstrand from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=106915#c3">comment #3</a>) > I really hate it, but I fear they may be allowed. From the GLSL 4.60 spec > in the section on UBO and SSBO layouts: > > > The shared qualifier overrides only the std140, std430, and packed > > qualifiers; other qualifiers are inherited. The compiler/linker will > > ensure that multiple programs and programmable stages containing this > > definition will share the same memory layout for this block, as long > > as all arrays are declared with explicit sizes and all matrices have > > matching row_major and/or column_major qualifications (which may come > > from a declaration outside the block definition). > > I really wish I hadn't found this text and I think it's silly but there it > is. I don't think this text has anything to do with this bug. s[] is not declared an explicit size.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>