<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [GLSL] Unused arrays declared without a size should be handled like arrays of size 1." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106915#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [GLSL] Unused arrays declared without a size should be handled like arrays of size 1." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106915">bug 106915</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jason@jlekstrand.net" title="Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>"> Jason Ekstrand</a> <pre>(In reply to Ian Romanick from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=106915#c4">comment #4</a>) > I don't think this text has anything to do with this bug. s[] is not > declared an explicit size. Exactly. My point is that the spec seems to explicitly allow for implicitly sized arrays (as opposed variable-length arrays at the end of the block). I'm not sure that actually means anything but I wouldn't be surprised if someone argues that it's intended. That said, I really hope we can get it disallowed because it's utterly insane at least for explicit buffer layouts. (I could see an argument in favor if the SSBO is implicitly laid out.)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>