<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - r600_shader_from_tgsi - GPR limit exceeded - shader requires 360 registers" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105371#c16">Comment # 16</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - r600_shader_from_tgsi - GPR limit exceeded - shader requires 360 registers" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105371">bug 105371</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mirh@protonmail.ch" title="mirh <mirh@protonmail.ch>"> mirh</a> <pre>(In reply to mirh from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=105371#c5">comment #5</a>) > (In reply to mirh from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=105371#c1">comment #1</a>) > > Can confirm it fixes shader 2 and 5 of GraphicsFuzz demo > > <a href="http://www.graphicsfuzz.com/benchmark/android-v1.html">http://www.graphicsfuzz.com/benchmark/android-v1.html</a> > > > > Should I wait for this (or, I dunno, some day sw fp64) to land before > > reporting of the others "gcm_sched_late_pass: unscheduled ops" errors? > > Well, colour me shocked, but after building mesa-git with the last patch > series all the tests now pass. > > Which is quite remarkable considering not even latest GCN closed drivers are > compliant. This with firefox though. Just noticed chromium 68 is still getting those errors for SETGT_DX10 and MULADD_IEEE, and indeed fails six tests. Nosb fixes it.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>