<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - swr doesn't compile with current LLVM 7.0 snapshots"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107146#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - swr doesn't compile with current LLVM 7.0 snapshots"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107146">bug 107146</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:alok.hota@intel.com" title="Alok Hota <alok.hota@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Alok Hota</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Bernhard Rosenkraenzer from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107146#c0">comment #0</a>)
<span class="quote">> createInstructionSimplifierPass() has been removed in LLVM. This is used in
> a few places in SWR; looks like this can safely be removed because it is
> always preceded by createInstructionCombiningPass() which seems to be a
> superset of what createInstructionSimplifierPass() used to do.
>
> Fixing this just unmasks another problem though -
> Intrinsic::x86_fma_vfmadd_ps_256 is gone. Not sure how to replace that
> properly.</span >
I can confirm we're seeing this issue as well.
(In reply to Philip Meulengracht from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107146#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=140731" name="attach_140731" title="proposed patch">attachment 140731</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=140731&action=edit" title="proposed patch">[details]</a></span> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=107146&attachment=140731'>[review]</a> [review]
> proposed patch
>
> See my attachment for a proposed patch - I encounted this error too and
> removed the references to the vfmaddps, and I removed the SimplePass's due
> to them being unnecessary. Please feel free to correct me or the patch if
> it's wrong.
>
> Instead of the vfmaddps it will use mul add.</span >
Thanks for the patch! I'm looking into this now.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>