<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - initial-exec TLS model breaks dlopen'ed libGL"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35268#c22">Comment # 22</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - initial-exec TLS model breaks dlopen'ed libGL"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35268">bug 35268</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:bugdal@aerifal.cx" title="Rich Felker <bugdal@aerifal.cx>"> <span class="fn">Rich Felker</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Ping.
Looking at this again, I see the original proposed patch introduced a lot of
extra asm to save/restore registers that might be clobbered by __tls_get_addr.
That could all go away if tlsdesc support is assumed and used.
The patch also adds some dubious prefix bytes to instructions in
_x86_64_get_dispatch. Is there any reason for that?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>