<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Query buffer object support is broken on r600."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108311#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Query buffer object support is broken on r600."
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108311">bug 108311</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:awesie@gmail.com" title="Andrew Wesie <awesie@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Andrew Wesie</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Dave Airlie from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=108311#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=141989" name="attach_141989" title="set larger alignment for tmp buffer offset">attachment 141989</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=141989&action=edit" title="set larger alignment for tmp buffer offset">[details]</a></span> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=108311&attachment=141989'>[review]</a> [review]
> set larger alignment for tmp buffer offset
>
> Does this patch work as an alternate?</span >
It looks like it should work but I'll test it with real hw.
Any reason you prefer this patch? It seems like it would use more heap space
without any notable benefits (e.g. should it have better performance
characteristics?).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>