[Mesa-stable] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965: Initialize inout_offset parameter to brw_search_cache().

[Paul Berry]

On 27 August 2013 16:51, Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:02:22AM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > On 07/24/2013 09:33 AM, Paul Berry wrote:
> > >Two callers of brw_search_cache() weren't initializing that function's
> > >inout_offset parameter: brw_blorp_const_color_params::get_wm_prog()
> > >and brw_blorp_const_color_params::get_wm_prog().
> > >
> > >That's a benign problem, since the only effect of not initializing
> > >inout_offset prior to calling brw_search_cache() is that the bit
> > >corresponding to cache_id in brw->state.dirty.cache may not be set
> > >reliably.  This is ok, since the cache_id's used by
> > >brw_blorp_const_color_params::get_wm_prog() and
> > >brw_blorp_blit_params::get_wm_prog() (BRW_BLORP_CONST_COLOR_PROG and
> > >BRW_BLORP_BLIT_PROG, respectively) correspond to dirty bits that are
> > >not used.
> > >
> > >However, failing to initialize this parameter causes valgrind to
> > >complain.  So let's go ahead and fix it to reduce valgrind noise.
> > >
> > >Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66779
>
> Can we have this commit in the 9.2 branch? It was added in the release
> blocker bug but never cherry-picked for 9.2.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Damien
>

Is there a reason for wanting this cherry-picked to 9.2 other than to
follow procedure?  As the commit message notes it's a benign problem--all
it does is cause false positives from valgrind.  I'd rather not mess with
9.2 if there's not going to be any benefit to users.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-stable/attachments/20130827/7ddb69ab/attachment.html>