[Mesa-stable] [PATCH 3/4 v2] i965: Fix execution size of scalar TCS barrier setup code.
Kenneth Graunke
kenneth at whitecape.org
Wed Aug 17 22:16:32 UTC 2016
Previously, the scalar TCS backend was generating:
mov(8) g17<1>UD 0x00000000UD { align1 WE_all 1Q compacted };
and(8) g17.2<1>UD g0.2<0,1,0>UD 0x0001e000UD { align1 WE_all 1Q };
shl(8) g17.2<1>UD g17.2<8,8,1>UD 0x0000000bUD { align1 WE_all 1Q };
or(8) g17.2<1>UD g17.2<8,8,1>UD 0x00008200UD { align1 WE_all 1Q };
send(8) null<1>UW g17<8,8,1>UD
gateway (barrier msg) mlen 1 rlen 0 { align1 WE_all 1Q };
This is rubbish - g17.2<8,8,1>UD spans two registers, and is an illegal
region. Not to mention it clobbers 8 channels of data when we only
wanted to touch m0.2.
Instead, we want:
mov(8) g17<1>UD 0x00000000UD { align1 WE_all 1Q compacted };
and(1) g17.2<1>UD g0.2<0,1,0>UD 0x0001e000UD { align1 WE_all };
shl(1) g17.2<1>UD g17.2<0,1,0>UD 0x0000000bUD { align1 WE_all };
or(1) g17.2<1>UD g17.2<0,1,0>UD 0x00008200UD { align1 WE_all };
send(8) null<1>UW g17<8,8,1>UD
gateway (barrier msg) mlen 1 rlen 0 { align1 WE_all 1Q };
Using component() accomplishes this.
Fixes GL44-CTS.tessellation_shader.tessellation_shader_tc_barriers.
barrier_guarded_read_write_calls on Skylake. Probably fixes other
barrier issues on Gen8+.
v2: Use a group(1, 0) builder so inst->exec_size is set correctly
(thanks to Francisco Jerez for catching that it was incorrect).
Cc: mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Alejandro PiƱeiro <apinheiro at igalia.com> [v1]
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_nir.cpp | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Oh yuck. I hadn't realized that inst->exec_size would still be bogus.
We definitely want that to match up. Thanks Curro! This look better?
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_nir.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_nir.cpp
index df033e1..a36765c 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_nir.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_nir.cpp
@@ -2420,22 +2420,22 @@ fs_visitor::nir_emit_tcs_intrinsic(const fs_builder &bld,
break;
fs_reg m0 = bld.vgrf(BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_UD, 1);
- fs_reg m0_2 = byte_offset(m0, 2 * sizeof(uint32_t));
+ fs_reg m0_2 = component(m0, 2);
- const fs_builder fwa_bld = bld.exec_all();
+ const fs_builder chanbld = bld.exec_all().group(1, 0);
/* Zero the message header */
- fwa_bld.MOV(m0, brw_imm_ud(0u));
+ bld.exec_all().MOV(m0, brw_imm_ud(0u));
/* Copy "Barrier ID" from r0.2, bits 16:13 */
- fwa_bld.AND(m0_2, retype(brw_vec1_grf(0, 2), BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_UD),
+ chanbld.AND(m0_2, retype(brw_vec1_grf(0, 2), BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_UD),
brw_imm_ud(INTEL_MASK(16, 13)));
/* Shift it up to bits 27:24. */
- fwa_bld.SHL(m0_2, m0_2, brw_imm_ud(11));
+ chanbld.SHL(m0_2, m0_2, brw_imm_ud(11));
/* Set the Barrier Count and the enable bit */
- fwa_bld.OR(m0_2, m0_2,
+ chanbld.OR(m0_2, m0_2,
brw_imm_ud(tcs_prog_data->instances << 8 | (1 << 15)));
bld.emit(SHADER_OPCODE_BARRIER, bld.null_reg_ud(), m0);
--
2.9.3
More information about the mesa-stable
mailing list