[Mesa-stable] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/va: also honors interlaced preference when providing a video format
Leo Liu
leo.liu at amd.com
Tue Sep 13 18:05:06 UTC 2016
On 09/13/2016 01:29 PM, Andy Furniss wrote:
> Leo Liu wrote:
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> On 09/13/2016 06:22 AM, Andy Furniss wrote:
>>> Zhang, Boyuan wrote:
>>>> Hi Leo, Christian and Julien,
>>>>
>>>> I tested the patch with Vaapi Encoding and Transcoding, it seems
>>>> working fine. We are using "VAAPI_DISABLE_INTERLACE" env, so
>>>> interlaced is always disabled.
>>>
>>> Though I notice it will break screen recording scripts for existing
>>> users who previously didn't need the env set but will after this.
>>>
>>> Totally untested/thought through, but maybe the env should default
>>> to on?
>>
>> Agree, can you come up a patch for that?
>
> OK, but maybe I should test a bit first to see if anything regresses.
>
> Unfortunately I today, by chance found an issue with mpv.
>
> With VAAPI_DISABLE_INTERLACE=1 which it needs for
>
> mpv --vo-vaapi all is apparently OK when playing say a 25fps vid,
> but I've found that if I push the framerate to refresh rate and
> do something that draws OSD than image is corrupted, possible many
> VM faults logged followed by a segfault in u_copy_yv12_img_to_nv12_surf
> this happens with or without the uv swap patch below. I will file a bug
> after more investigation. Bisecting mesa goes back to the commit that
> introduced VAAPI_DISABLE_INTERLACE.
We have to be careful, we cannot override preferred interlaced type, got
from querying.
>
>> Also any outstanding patches for VA-API encode from you was reviewed,
>> but not committed?
>> if any, sent to me, I can push them.
>
> There's only
>
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-July/124695.html
>
> for the uv swap issue.
Done. pushed.
>
> Not my issue as such, but did anyone notice this from Mark Thompson, who
> does vaapi for libav/ffmpeg?
>
> I notice he didn't keep the CCs so maybe it got missed.
>
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-September/128076.html
>
>
>
Did anyone have this reviewed?
Regards,
Leo
More information about the mesa-stable
mailing list