[Mesa-stable] [PATCH 2/2] gallium/os: fix os_time_get_nano() to roll over less
Jose Fonseca
jfonseca at vmware.com
Wed Aug 16 22:37:50 UTC 2017
On 16/08/17 14:22, Brian Paul wrote:
> From: Frank Richter <frank.richter at dynardo.de>
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102241
> Cc: mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org
> Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <brianp at vmware.com>
> ---
> src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c b/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c
> index e169139..e4a1cae 100644
> --- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c
> +++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/os/os_time.c
> @@ -69,10 +69,17 @@ os_time_get_nano(void)
>
> static LARGE_INTEGER frequency;
> LARGE_INTEGER counter;
> + int64_t secs, nanosecs;
> if(!frequency.QuadPart)
> QueryPerformanceFrequency(&frequency);
> QueryPerformanceCounter(&counter);
> - return counter.QuadPart*INT64_C(1000000000)/frequency.QuadPart;
> + /* Compute seconds and nanoseconds parts separately to
> + * reduce severity of precision loss.
> + */
> + secs = counter.QuadPart / frequency.QuadPart;
> + nanosecs = (counter.QuadPart % frequency.QuadPart) * INT64_C(1000000000)
> + / frequency.QuadPart;
> + return secs*INT64_C(1000000000) + nanosecs;
>
> #else
>
>
Series looks great.
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Jose Fonseca <jfonseca at vmware.com>
More information about the mesa-stable
mailing list