[Mesa-stable] [Fwd: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] intel/isl: Use uint64_t to store total surface size]

[Anuj Phogat]

These patches are not fixing any known bug. But they are adding the
previously missing surface size limits for the hardware. It's really hard
to hit these limits. But, let's pick them to stable for the sake of completion.
Thanks for marking them for mesa-stable.


On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Andres Gomez <agomez at igalia.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 18:21 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 3 July 2017 at 21:14, Andres Gomez <agomez at igalia.com> wrote:
>> > Actually, forgot to add -stable into CC.
>> >
>> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> > From: Andres Gomez <agomez at igalia.com>
>> > To: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat at gmail.com>, mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
>> > Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] intel/isl: Use uint64_t to store
>> > total surface size
>> > Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 23:02:31 +0300
>> >
>> > It looks like we could want these 2 into -stable (?)
>> >
>>
>> Shouldn't hurt, despite that most of the
>> isl_surf_init/isl_surf_get_[a-z]_surf handling is a simple assert(ok).
>> I'll leave the call to the experts, but my take is "don't bother".
>
> OK, I'll wait to see if Anuj has anything to say before picking this
> one, then.
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
> --
> Br,
>
> Andres