[Mesa-stable] [PATCH 03/10] i965: Perform HiZ flush/stall prior to HiZ resolves
Jason Ekstrand
jason at jlekstrand.net
Tue Jun 6 00:58:27 UTC 2017
Patches 1-3 should have been CC'd to stable.
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net> wrote:
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> -----
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp.c
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp.c
> index 1e4c0de..097903e 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp.c
> @@ -1030,7 +1030,12 @@ intel_hiz_exec(struct brw_context *brw, struct
> intel_mipmap_tree *mt,
> DBG("%s %s to mt %p level %d layers %d-%d\n",
> __func__, opname, mt, level, start_layer, start_layer + num_layers
> - 1);
>
> - if (op == BLORP_HIZ_OP_DEPTH_CLEAR) {
> + /* The following stalls and flushes are only documented to be required
> for
> + * HiZ clear operations. However, they also seem to be required for
> the
> + * HiZ resolve operation which is basically the same as a fast clear
> only a
> + * different value is written into the HiZ surface.
> + */
> + if (op == BLORP_HIZ_OP_DEPTH_CLEAR || op == BLORP_HIZ_OP_HIZ_RESOLVE) {
> if (brw->gen == 6) {
> /* From the Sandy Bridge PRM, volume 2 part 1, page 313:
> *
> @@ -1081,18 +1086,26 @@ intel_hiz_exec(struct brw_context *brw, struct
> intel_mipmap_tree *mt,
> gen6_blorp_hiz_exec(brw, mt, level, start_layer + a, op);
> }
>
> - if (brw->gen == 6 && op == BLORP_HIZ_OP_DEPTH_CLEAR) {
> - /* From the Sandy Bridge PRM, volume 2 part 1, page 314:
> - *
> - * "DevSNB, DevSNB-B{W/A}]: Depth buffer clear pass must be
> followed
> - * by a PIPE_CONTROL command with DEPTH_STALL bit set and Then
> - * followed by Depth FLUSH'
> - */
> - brw_emit_pipe_control_flush(brw,
> - PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_STALL);
>
> - brw_emit_pipe_control_flush(brw,
> - PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH |
> - PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL);
> + /* The following stalls and flushes are only documented to be required
> for
> + * HiZ clear operations. However, they also seem to be required for
> the
> + * HiZ resolve operation which is basically the same as a fast clear
> only a
> + * different value is written into the HiZ surface.
> + */
> + if (op == BLORP_HIZ_OP_DEPTH_CLEAR || op == BLORP_HIZ_OP_HIZ_RESOLVE) {
> + if (brw->gen == 6) {
> + /* From the Sandy Bridge PRM, volume 2 part 1, page 314:
> + *
> + * "DevSNB, DevSNB-B{W/A}]: Depth buffer clear pass must be
> + * followed by a PIPE_CONTROL command with DEPTH_STALL bit
> set
> + * and Then followed by Depth FLUSH'
> + */
> + brw_emit_pipe_control_flush(brw,
> + PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_STALL);
> +
> + brw_emit_pipe_control_flush(brw,
> + PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH |
> + PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL);
> + }
> }
> }
> --
> 2.5.0.400.gff86faf
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-stable/attachments/20170605/76b44ccc/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the mesa-stable
mailing list